OBJECTIVE: To examine impairment in cone- versus rod-mediated dark adaptation in the parafovea of persons with age-related maculopathy (ARM). DESIGN: Cross-sectional. PARTICIPANTS: Older adults with ARM at various severity levels from early to advanced (n = 83) and in good retinal health (n = 43), as determined by stereo fundus photographs evaluated with the Age-Related Eye Disease Study severity scale. METHODS: Dark adaptation, both cone- and rod-mediated components, was measured with a modified Humphrey Field Analyzer using a target located 12 degrees in the inferior visual field on the vertical meridian, after exposure to a 98% bleach. Information was collected on self-reported problems for activities at night or under dim illumination (Low Luminance Questionnaire [LLQ]) and for activities during daytime conditions (modified National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire [NEI VFQ]). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cone- and rod-mediated parameters of dark adaptation. RESULTS: Compared with older adults in normal retinal health, ARM patients had significant impairments in rod-mediated parameters of dark adaptation (rod-cone break, rod slope, rod sensitivity) (P<0.0001), which were increasingly abnormal as disease severity increased. Cone-mediated parameters (cone time constant and cone sensitivity) were not impaired. Low Luminance Questionnaire scores and NEI VFQ scores decreased with increased ARM severity (P = 0.0004 and P = 0.0005, respectively); the percent decrease in LLQ scores as a function of disease severity was larger in magnitude than the percent decrease in NEI VFQ scores. CONCLUSIONS: Disturbances in rod-mediated but not cone-mediated dark adaptation in the parafovea at 12 degrees in the inferior field on the vertical meridian are characteristic of ARM even in its early phases.
OBJECTIVE: To examine impairment in cone- versus rod-mediated dark adaptation in the parafovea of persons with age-related maculopathy (ARM). DESIGN: Cross-sectional. PARTICIPANTS: Older adults with ARM at various severity levels from early to advanced (n = 83) and in good retinal health (n = 43), as determined by stereo fundus photographs evaluated with the Age-Related Eye Disease Study severity scale. METHODS: Dark adaptation, both cone- and rod-mediated components, was measured with a modified Humphrey Field Analyzer using a target located 12 degrees in the inferior visual field on the vertical meridian, after exposure to a 98% bleach. Information was collected on self-reported problems for activities at night or under dim illumination (Low Luminance Questionnaire [LLQ]) and for activities during daytime conditions (modified National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire [NEI VFQ]). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cone- and rod-mediated parameters of dark adaptation. RESULTS: Compared with older adults in normal retinal health, ARM patients had significant impairments in rod-mediated parameters of dark adaptation (rod-cone break, rod slope, rod sensitivity) (P<0.0001), which were increasingly abnormal as disease severity increased. Cone-mediated parameters (cone time constant and cone sensitivity) were not impaired. Low Luminance Questionnaire scores and NEI VFQ scores decreased with increased ARM severity (P = 0.0004 and P = 0.0005, respectively); the percent decrease in LLQ scores as a function of disease severity was larger in magnitude than the percent decrease in NEI VFQ scores. CONCLUSIONS: Disturbances in rod-mediated but not cone-mediated dark adaptation in the parafovea at 12 degrees in the inferior field on the vertical meridian are characteristic of ARM even in its early phases.
Authors: Mark E Clark; Gerald McGwin; David Neely; Richard Feist; John O Mason; Martin Thomley; Milton F White; Bunyamin Ozaydin; Christopher A Girkin; Cynthia Owsley Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2011-02-02 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Gerald McGwin; Bradford Mitchell; Karen Searcey; Michael A Albert; Richard Feist; John O Mason; Martin Thomley; Cynthia Owsley Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2013-07-05 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: S Scott Whitmore; Elliott H Sohn; Kathleen R Chirco; Arlene V Drack; Edwin M Stone; Budd A Tucker; Robert F Mullins Journal: Prog Retin Eye Res Date: 2014-12-05 Impact factor: 21.198