Literature DB >> 17822926

Neural processes underlying intuitive coherence judgments as revealed by fMRI on a semantic judgment task.

Ruediger Ilg1, Kai Vogeley, Thomas Goschke, Annette Bolte, Jon N Shah, Ernst Pöppel, Gereon R Fink.   

Abstract

Daily-life decisions and judgments are often made "intuitively", i.e., without an explicit explanation or verbal justification. We conceive of intuition as the capacity for an effortless evaluation of complex situations on the basis of information being activated, but at the moment of decision not being consciously retrieved. Little is known about which neural processes mediate intuitive judgments and whether these are distinct from those neural processes underlying explicit judgments. Employing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) we show that intuitive compared to explicit judgments in a semantic coherence judgment task are associated with increased neural activity in heteromodal association areas in bilateral inferior parietal and right superior temporal cortex. These results indicate that intuitive coherence judgments activate neural systems that are involved in the integration of remote associates into a coherent representation and, thus, support the assumption that intuitive judgments are based on an activation of widespread semantic networks sparing a conscious representation.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17822926     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  10 in total

1.  Intuition, insight, and the right hemisphere: Emergence of higher sociocognitive functions.

Authors:  Simon M McCrea
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2010-03-03

2.  Cortical regions activated by the subjective sense of perceptual coherence of environmental sounds: a proposal for a neuroscience of intuition.

Authors:  Kirsten G Volz; Rudolf Rübsamen; D Yves von Cramon
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Do intuitive and deliberate judgments rely on two distinct neural systems? A case study in face processing.

Authors:  Laura F Mega; Gerd Gigerenzer; Kirsten G Volz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Neural substrates of similarity and rule-based strategies in judgment.

Authors:  Bettina von Helversen; Linnea Karlsson; Björn Rasch; Jörg Rieskamp
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 5.  Approaching the Distinction between Intuition and Insight.

Authors:  Zhonglu Zhang; Yi Lei; Hong Li
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-08-09

6.  Feelings-of-Warmth Increase More Abruptly for Verbal Riddles Solved With in Contrast to Without Aha! Experience.

Authors:  Jasmin M Kizilirmak; Violetta Serger; Judith Kehl; Michael Öllinger; Kristian Folta-Schoofs; Alan Richardson-Klavehn
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-08-13

7.  Ultra-high-field fMRI insights on insight: Neural correlates of the Aha!-moment.

Authors:  Martin Tik; Ronald Sladky; Caroline Di Bernardi Luft; David Willinger; André Hoffmann; Michael J Banissy; Joydeep Bhattacharya; Christian Windischberger
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Continuity in intuition and insight: from real to naturalistic virtual environment.

Authors:  M Eskinazi; I Giannopulu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Intuitive decision making as a gradual process: investigating semantic intuition-based and priming-based decisions with fMRI.

Authors:  Thea Zander; Ninja K Horr; Annette Bolte; Kirsten G Volz
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 2.708

10.  Personality, Stress, and Intuition: Emotion Regulation Abilities Moderate the Effect of Stress-Dependent Cortisol Increase on Coherence Judgments.

Authors:  Elise L Radtke; Rainer Düsing; Julius Kuhl; Mattie Tops; Markus Quirin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-02-27
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.