Literature DB >> 17822830

Advanced Cardiac Life Support Courses: live actors do not improve training results compared with conventional manikins.

Heberth C Miotto1, Braulio R G M Couto, Eugenio M A Goulart, Carlos Faria Santos Amaral, Maria da Consolacao V Moreira.   

Abstract

PRIMARY
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether using live actors to increase the reality of the scenario improves knowledge retention in Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) Courses. MAIN SECONDARY
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of age, time since graduation from nursing or medicine, sex, medical specialty, and workplace in knowledge retention.
METHODS: From December 2004 to October 2005, 19 selected ACLS courses were divided at random in two groups: group A (ACLS courses with conventional manikins plus live actors) and group B (ACLS courses with conventional manikins). The live actors vocalized appropriately to create more realistic scenarios. The participants' relevant theoretical knowledge was assessed before the course (pre-test), immediately after the course (post-test), and 6 months after the course (final-test).
RESULTS: Four hundred and thirty-five participants were recruited and allocated at random allocated to either group A or B. Overall, the data of 225 participants (51.7%; 111 in group A and 114 in group B) who completed the entire sequence of pre-, post-, and final-tests were analysed. On univariate analysis, the use of live actors, workplace, gender, and healthcare provider profession did not affect pre-, post-, and final-test results (p>0.1). The results in all three tests correlated negatively with time since medical or nursing graduation (95% C.I. -0.53 to -0.17, -0.43 to -0.2, and -0.42 to -0.11, respectively, p<0.05) and age (and 95% C.I. -0.56 to -0.21, -0.42 to -0.2, and -0.38 to -0.07, respectively, p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: The use of live actors did not affect knowledge retention in this group. Older age and a longer period since graduation were associated with the worst scores and the lowest levels of knowledge retention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17822830     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2007.07.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  5 in total

1.  Part 12: Education, implementation, and teams: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Jasmeet Soar; Mary E Mancini; Farhan Bhanji; John E Billi; Jennifer Dennett; Judith Finn; Matthew Huei-Ming Ma; Gavin D Perkins; David L Rodgers; Mary Fran Hazinski; Ian Jacobs; Peter T Morley
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.262

2.  Simulation-based skills training: a qualitative interview study exploring surgical trainees' experience of stress.

Authors:  Maria Suong Tjønnås; Anita Das; Cecilie Våpenstad; Solveig Osborg Ose
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2022-10-22

Review 3.  Memory CD4 T cell-mediated immunity against influenza A virus: more than a little helpful.

Authors:  K Kai McKinstry; Richard W Dutton; Susan L Swain; Tara M Strutt
Journal:  Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz)       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 4.291

4.  Assessment of nurses' cardiopulmonary resuscitation knowledge and skills within three district hospitals in Botswana.

Authors:  Lakshmi Rajeswaran; Megan Cox; Stoffel Moeng; Billy M Tsima
Journal:  Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med       Date:  2018-04-12

5.  Impact of the Use of Simulated Patients in Basic First Aid Training on Laypeople Knowledge, Skills, and Self-efficacy: A Controlled Experimental Study.

Authors:  Bert Avau; Anne-Catherine Vanhove; Hans Scheers; Stijn Stroobants; Karen Lauwers; Philippe Vandekerckhove; Emmy De Buck
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.690

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.