Literature DB >> 17822644

Prolonged standing in the OR: a Dutch research study.

Paul Meijsen1, Hanneke J J Knibbe.   

Abstract

Prolonged standing is considered to be an occupational risk factor for musculoskeletal disorders. This cross-sectional, multicenter study examined whether Dutch perioperative personnel exceeded ergonomic guidelines for standing in the workplace (ie, not more than one hour of continuous standing and not more than four hours of standing in total per day). Perioperative personnel in 16 hospitals recorded their standing times on a daily basis. The average standing time in the OR was 2.5 hours per work day; however, participants exceeded the ergonomic guidelines on two out of three work days.A reduction in the source of the strain is considered to be the most effective way to prevent occupational health problems. Taking "microbreaks" to relax or move and job duty rotation could help reduce excessive physical stress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17822644     DOI: 10.1016/j.aorn.2007.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AORN J        ISSN: 0001-2092            Impact factor:   0.676


  4 in total

1.  The Effect of Prolonged Walking With Intermittent Standing on Erector Spinae and Soleus Muscle Oxygenation and Discomfort.

Authors:  April J Chambers; Justin M Haney; Theodore Huppert; Mark S Redfern
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 2.  Evidence of health risks associated with prolonged standing at work and intervention effectiveness.

Authors:  Thomas R Waters; Robert B Dick
Journal:  Rehabil Nurs       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 1.625

3.  The Influence of Using a Footstool during a Prolonged Standing Task on Low Back Pain in Office Workers.

Authors:  Michelle D Smith; Chun Shing Johnson Kwan; Sally Zhang; Jason Wheeler; Tennille Sewell; Venerina Johnston
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  The Work Ability of Hong Kong Construction Workers in Relation to Individual and Work-Related Factors.

Authors:  Jacky Y K Ng; Alan H S Chan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.