OBJECTIVES: To investigate the frequency of impaired oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in patients with dental anxiety. METHODS: OHRQoL was measured with the German version of the 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) developed by Slade and Spencer (1994) in 173 adult patients with dental anxiety [Dental Anxiety Scale (DAS) score 15 or above and Dental Fear Survey (DFS) score 60 or above]. The OHIP summary scores were characterized with an empirical cumulative distribution function and compared with the level of impaired OHRQoL in the general population (n = 2026, age: 16-79 years). In addition, OHIP item prevalences (responses 'fairly often'/'very often') were compared between patients and population subjects. The correlation between DAS, DFS and OHIP scores was calculated using the Pearson correlation coefficient. RESULTS: A median value of 1 and a 90th percentile value of 13 were observed for general population subjects. In contrast, patients with phobic dental anxiety had a median OHIP-14 of 21 and the 90th percentile of 40. All problems mentioned in the OHIP-14 were more prevalent in patients than in population subjects. The most frequently occurring items in patients were 'self-conscious', 'life in general was less satisfying', and 'feeling tense' with prevalences of 50% or greater. In contrast, these items had prevalences of only 1-3% in the general population. A low to moderate relationship between OHRQoL and both dental anxiety measures (DAS and DFS) was observed (r = 0.25/0.26, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with dental anxiety/fear suffer considerably from impaired OHRQoL and the degree of this impairment is related to the extent of dental anxiety/fear.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the frequency of impaired oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in patients with dental anxiety. METHODS:OHRQoL was measured with the German version of the 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) developed by Slade and Spencer (1994) in 173 adult patients with dental anxiety [Dental Anxiety Scale (DAS) score 15 or above and Dental Fear Survey (DFS) score 60 or above]. The OHIP summary scores were characterized with an empirical cumulative distribution function and compared with the level of impaired OHRQoL in the general population (n = 2026, age: 16-79 years). In addition, OHIP item prevalences (responses 'fairly often'/'very often') were compared between patients and population subjects. The correlation between DAS, DFS and OHIP scores was calculated using the Pearson correlation coefficient. RESULTS: A median value of 1 and a 90th percentile value of 13 were observed for general population subjects. In contrast, patients with phobic dental anxiety had a median OHIP-14 of 21 and the 90th percentile of 40. All problems mentioned in the OHIP-14 were more prevalent in patients than in population subjects. The most frequently occurring items in patients were 'self-conscious', 'life in general was less satisfying', and 'feeling tense' with prevalences of 50% or greater. In contrast, these items had prevalences of only 1-3% in the general population. A low to moderate relationship between OHRQoL and both dental anxiety measures (DAS and DFS) was observed (r = 0.25/0.26, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS:Patients with dental anxiety/fear suffer considerably from impaired OHRQoL and the degree of this impairment is related to the extent of dental anxiety/fear.
Authors: Marília Leão Goettems; Thiago Machado Ardenghi; Ana Regina Romano; Flávio Fernando Demarco; Dione Dias Torriani Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2010-12-24 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Ronny A Bell; Thomas A Arcury; Andrea M Anderson; Haiying Chen; Margaret R Savoca; Gregg H Gilbert; Sara A Quandt Journal: J Public Health Dent Date: 2011-10-10 Impact factor: 1.821
Authors: Arndt Guentsch; Christiane Stier; Gregor F Raschke; André Peisker; Mina D Fahmy; Harald Kuepper; Ina Schueler Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2016-09-05 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Oliver Schierz; Mike T John; Daniel R Reissmann; Mats Mehrstedt; András Szentpétery Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2008-06-04 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Maria Lenk; Hendrik Berth; Peter Joraschky; Katja Petrowski; Kerstin Weidner; Christian Hannig Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2013-08-05 Impact factor: 5.594