Literature DB >> 17821993

Performance of a hybrid MC dose algorithm for IMRT optimization dose evaluation.

Jeffrey V Siebers1, Iwan Kawrakow, V Ramakrishnan.   

Abstract

This paper presents a hybrid intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) optimization strategy which combines the speed of pencil beam (PB) and the accuracy of Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculations. After an initial deliverable-based optimization using a PB algorithm, doses are recomputed using the VMC++ MC code to determine dose correction factors, which are then utilized during further PB-based optimization. The hybrid method is benchmarked with respect to full MC deliverable-based optimization for ten prostate and ten head-and-neck IMRT plans. Final optimized plans are compared in terms of dose-volume indices used for the plan optimization. Dose prediction errors (DPEs) and optimization convergence errors (OCEs) at intermediate steps of the hybrid sequence are evaluated. The hybrid method is found to produce optimized plans that are clinically equivalent to full MC-based optimization, yet requires only 40% of the number of MC dose calculations. With the hybrid strategy presented here, MC-based optimization results are achieved in 35 min or less on a modest computing cluster. While the initial PB-deliverable-based optimization is found to have DPEs and OCEs of up to 3 Gy relative to the 65-73 Gy prescription doses, application of the first MC correction reduces the average DPEs to less than 0.3 Gy for the prostate plans and less than 0.06 Gy for the head and neck plans. The maximum observed DPE or OCE is 0.7 Gy after 1 MC dose correction, indicating that a single MC dose calculation correction might be sufficient for IMRT optimization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17821993     DOI: 10.1118/1.2745236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  5 in total

1.  The effect of statistical noise on IMRT plan quality and convergence for MC-based and MC-correction-based optimized treatment plans.

Authors:  Jeffrey V Siebers
Journal:  J Phys Conf Ser       Date:  2008-04-04

Review 2.  Adaptive proton therapy.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Pablo Botas; Gregory C Sharp; Brian Winey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Evaluation of dose prediction errors and optimization convergence errors of deliverable-based head-and-neck IMRT plans computed with a superposition/convolution dose algorithm.

Authors:  I B Mihaylov; J V Siebers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Review of fast monte carlo codes for dose calculation in radiation therapy treatment planning.

Authors:  Keyvan Jabbari
Journal:  J Med Signals Sens       Date:  2011-01

5.  Patient-specific CT dosimetry calculation: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Thomas Fearon; Huchen Xie; Jason Y Cheng; Holly Ning; Ying Zhuge; Robert W Miller
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.102

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.