Literature DB >> 17805293

Raptorial jaws in the throat help moray eels swallow large prey.

Rita S Mehta1, Peter C Wainwright.   

Abstract

Most bony fishes rely on suction mechanisms to capture and transport prey. Once captured, prey are carried by water movement inside the oral cavity to a second set of jaws in the throat, the pharyngeal jaws, which manipulate the prey and assist in swallowing. Moray eels display much less effective suction-feeding abilities. Given this reduction in a feeding mechanism that is widespread and highly conserved in aquatic vertebrates, it is not known how moray eels swallow large fish and cephalopods. Here we show that the moray eel (Muraena retifera) overcomes reduced suction capacity by launching raptorial pharyngeal jaws out of its throat and into its oral cavity, where the jaws grasp the struggling prey animal and transport it back to the throat and into the oesophagus. This is the first described case of a vertebrate using a second set of jaws to both restrain and transport prey, and is the only alternative to the hydraulic prey transport reported in teleost fishes. The extreme mobility of the moray pharyngeal jaws is made possible by elongation of the muscles that control the jaws, coupled with reduction of adjacent gill-arch structures. The discovery that pharyngeal jaws can reach up from behind the skull to grasp prey in the oral jaws reveals a major innovation that may have contributed to the success of moray eels as apex predators hunting within the complex matrix of coral reefs. This alternative prey transport mode is mechanically similar to the ratcheting mechanisms used in snakes--a group of terrestrial vertebrates that share striking morphological, behavioural and ecological convergence with moray eels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17805293     DOI: 10.1038/nature06062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  7 in total

1.  Decoupled diversification dynamics of feeding morphology following a major functional innovation in marine butterflyfishes.

Authors:  Nicolai Konow; Samantha Price; Richard Abom; David Bellwood; Peter Wainwright
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Grand Challenges in Comparative Tooth Biology.

Authors:  C Darrin Hulsey; Karly E Cohen; Zerina Johanson; Nidal Karagic; Axel Meyer; Craig T Miller; Alexa Sadier; Adam P Summers; Gareth J Fraser
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 3.326

3.  A digital dissection of two teleost fishes: comparative functional anatomy of the cranial musculoskeletal system in pike (Esox lucius) and eel (Anguilla anguilla).

Authors:  Robert Brocklehurst; Laura Porro; Anthony Herrel; Dominique Adriaens; Emily Rayfield
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Reversal to air-driven sound production revealed by a molecular phylogeny of tongueless frogs, family Pipidae.

Authors:  Iker Irisarri; Miguel Vences; Diego San Mauro; Frank Glaw; Rafael Zardoya
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  An ancient gene network is co-opted for teeth on old and new jaws.

Authors:  Gareth J Fraser; C Darrin Hulsey; Ryan F Bloomquist; Kristine Uyesugi; Nancy R Manley; J Todd Streelman
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 8.029

6.  Genetic identification of marine eels through DNA barcoding from Parangipettai coastal waters.

Authors:  Samuel Peninal; Janakiraman Subramanian; Alaganatham Elavarasi; Murugaiyan Kalaiselvam
Journal:  Genom Data       Date:  2016-12-09

7.  Novel gene rearrangement in the mitochondrial genome of Muraenesox cinereus and the phylogenetic relationship of Anguilliformes.

Authors:  Kun Zhang; Kehua Zhu; Yifan Liu; Hua Zhang; Li Gong; Lihua Jiang; Liqin Liu; Zhenming Lü; Bingjian Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.