Albert Losken1, Daniel J Holtz. 1. Atlanta, Ga. From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Management of the breast following massive weight loss is challenging. Specific issues include an unstable envelope (skin laxity) and an unstable mound (decent and volume loss). The evolution of a technique is presented. METHODS: A retrospective review of all massive weight loss patients who underwent superomedial pedicle mastopexy techniques was performed. The current procedure involves incorporating the lower pole of the breast and rotating it superiorly. The lateral breast flap is then advanced medially and plicated. This essentially (1) autoaugments the upper pole, (2) narrows the wide breast, (3) provides an internal sling, and (4) redefines and secures the inframammary fold. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were included in the series. The average body mass index was 26.5, and the average weight loss was 121 pounds. Six patients (17 percent) had mastopexy augmentation. Wise pattern skin takeout was performed in 89 percent of patients. The revision rate for the series was 11 percent. The average follow-up was 1.7 years. CONCLUSIONS: The superomedial pedicle is a versatile, well-vascularized pedicle that allows for glandular plication of the lower pole and autoaugmentation of the upper pole once rotated. Parenchymal shaping through plication and suspension of the breast mound should improve breast shape over time, theoretically reducing the incidence of recurrent ptosis as breast shape relies less on the often inelastic skin envelope. It applies a familiar and reliable technique, with certain modifications, to improve results and maintain shape in the long, deflated, massive weight loss breast.
BACKGROUND: Management of the breast following massive weight loss is challenging. Specific issues include an unstable envelope (skin laxity) and an unstable mound (decent and volume loss). The evolution of a technique is presented. METHODS: A retrospective review of all massive weight losspatients who underwent superomedial pedicle mastopexy techniques was performed. The current procedure involves incorporating the lower pole of the breast and rotating it superiorly. The lateral breast flap is then advanced medially and plicated. This essentially (1) autoaugments the upper pole, (2) narrows the wide breast, (3) provides an internal sling, and (4) redefines and secures the inframammary fold. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were included in the series. The average body mass index was 26.5, and the average weight loss was 121 pounds. Six patients (17 percent) had mastopexy augmentation. Wise pattern skin takeout was performed in 89 percent of patients. The revision rate for the series was 11 percent. The average follow-up was 1.7 years. CONCLUSIONS: The superomedial pedicle is a versatile, well-vascularized pedicle that allows for glandular plication of the lower pole and autoaugmentation of the upper pole once rotated. Parenchymal shaping through plication and suspension of the breast mound should improve breast shape over time, theoretically reducing the incidence of recurrent ptosis as breast shape relies less on the often inelastic skin envelope. It applies a familiar and reliable technique, with certain modifications, to improve results and maintain shape in the long, deflated, massive weight loss breast.