BACKGROUND: Fatigue is associated with cancer and its treatment but we know little about how many and which patients suffer fatigue of clinical severity. We aimed to determine the prevalence of clinically relevant fatigue (CRF) and its associations in outpatients with various cancer diagnoses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A survey of outpatients with colorectal, breast, gynaecological, genitourinary, sarcoma, melanoma and miscellaneous tumours at a regional cancer centre. Patients completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) fatigue subscale and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). These self-report data were linked to demographic and clinical variables. Data were available on 2867 outpatients. RESULTS: The prevalence of CRF (EORTC fatigue subscale > or =40) was 32% (95% confidence interval 31-34%). The variables independently associated with CRF were primary cancer site, having disease present, type of cancer treatment and emotional distress (total HADS score > or =15). Emotional distress had the strongest association with fatigue but half the cases of CRF were not distressed. CONCLUSION: CRF is common in cancer outpatients and is associated with type of disease and treatment, as well as with emotional distress. The association between CRF and emotional distress is strong but they are not equivalent conditions.
BACKGROUND: Fatigue is associated with cancer and its treatment but we know little about how many and which patients suffer fatigue of clinical severity. We aimed to determine the prevalence of clinically relevant fatigue (CRF) and its associations in outpatients with various cancer diagnoses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A survey of outpatients with colorectal, breast, gynaecological, genitourinary, sarcoma, melanoma and miscellaneous tumours at a regional cancer centre. Patients completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) fatigue subscale and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). These self-report data were linked to demographic and clinical variables. Data were available on 2867 outpatients. RESULTS: The prevalence of CRF (EORTC fatigue subscale > or =40) was 32% (95% confidence interval 31-34%). The variables independently associated with CRF were primary cancer site, having disease present, type of cancer treatment and emotional distress (total HADS score > or =15). Emotional distress had the strongest association with fatigue but half the cases of CRF were not distressed. CONCLUSION: CRF is common in cancer outpatients and is associated with type of disease and treatment, as well as with emotional distress. The association between CRF and emotional distress is strong but they are not equivalent conditions.
Authors: G Aprile; F E Pisa; A Follador; L Foltran; F De Pauli; M Mazzer; S Lutrino; C S Sacco; M Mansutti; G Fasola Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2012-06-22 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Jennifer M Jones; Karin Olson; Pamela Catton; Charles N Catton; Neil E Fleshner; Monika K Krzyzanowska; David R McCready; Rebecca K S Wong; Haiyan Jiang; Doris Howell Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Fay Wright; Gail D'Eramo Melkus; Marilyn Hammer; Brian L Schmidt; M Tish Knobf; Steven M Paul; Frances Cartwright; Judy Mastick; Bruce A Cooper; Lee-May Chen; Michelle Melisko; Jon D Levine; Kord Kober; Bradley E Aouizerat; Christine Miaskowski Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2015-03-28 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Michael J Fisch; Fengmin Zhao; Ann M O'Mara; Xin Shelley Wang; David Cella; Charles S Cleeland Journal: Cancer Date: 2013-10-21 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Melisa L Wong; Steven M Paul; Judy Mastick; Christine Ritchie; Michael A Steinman; Louise C Walter; Christine Miaskowski Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2018-08-23 Impact factor: 3.612