Johanna C Badcock1, David R Badcock, Christina Read, Assen Jablensky. 1. Centre for Clinical Research in Neuropsychiatry/Graylands Hospital and School of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Western Australia, John XXIII Avenue, Mt. Claremont, WA, 6010, Australia. jobad@cyllene.uwa.edu.au
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Visuospatial working memory is not a unitary sketch pad but comprises independent dimensions of target distance and direction and at least two levels of detail (fine-grained and category level). The aim of this study was to examine these multiple aspects of encoding in patients with schizophrenia using a modified delayed response task. METHOD: 42 patients with schizophrenia and 48 healthy controls pointed, as accurately as possible from a fixed starting position, to the visual location of target stimuli presented to a touch-sensitive screen. An adaptive staircase procedure was used to equate stimulus duration for each individual. Encoding accuracy and maintenance of distance (mm) and direction ( degrees ) information was examined following a 0-second (immediate) or 4-second (unfilled) delay. Analyses utilized both absolute (unsigned) and signed data. RESULTS: The results showed that the average duration required to detect a target was significantly longer in patients than controls. When stimulus duration was equated, (a) the absolute accuracy of distance and direction responses was not significantly different between groups at 0-second delay but was significantly reduced at 4-second delay in patients with schizophrenia, and (b) signed direction errors at 4-second delay were significantly different between groups at stimulus angles greater than 90 degrees . CONCLUSIONS: The findings challenge previous suggestions of deficits in fine-grained encoding of spatial information in schizophrenia but confirm a difficulty maintaining both direction and distance details in working memory. Imprecision in spatial memory in schizophrenia also introduced greater bias from category level (prior) representations, especially in left hemi-space.
BACKGROUND: Visuospatial working memory is not a unitary sketch pad but comprises independent dimensions of target distance and direction and at least two levels of detail (fine-grained and category level). The aim of this study was to examine these multiple aspects of encoding in patients with schizophrenia using a modified delayed response task. METHOD: 42 patients with schizophrenia and 48 healthy controls pointed, as accurately as possible from a fixed starting position, to the visual location of target stimuli presented to a touch-sensitive screen. An adaptive staircase procedure was used to equate stimulus duration for each individual. Encoding accuracy and maintenance of distance (mm) and direction ( degrees ) information was examined following a 0-second (immediate) or 4-second (unfilled) delay. Analyses utilized both absolute (unsigned) and signed data. RESULTS: The results showed that the average duration required to detect a target was significantly longer in patients than controls. When stimulus duration was equated, (a) the absolute accuracy of distance and direction responses was not significantly different between groups at 0-second delay but was significantly reduced at 4-second delay in patients with schizophrenia, and (b) signed direction errors at 4-second delay were significantly different between groups at stimulus angles greater than 90 degrees . CONCLUSIONS: The findings challenge previous suggestions of deficits in fine-grained encoding of spatial information in schizophrenia but confirm a difficulty maintaining both direction and distance details in working memory. Imprecision in spatial memory in schizophrenia also introduced greater bias from category level (prior) representations, especially in left hemi-space.
Authors: James M Gold; Britta Hahn; Wei Wei Zhang; Benjamin M Robinson; Emily S Kappenman; Valerie M Beck; Steven J Luck Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2010-06
Authors: Michael J Coleman; Olga Krastoshevsky; Xiawei Tu; Nancy R Mendell; Deborah L Levy Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2012-05-27 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Martina Starc; John D Murray; Nicole Santamauro; Aleksandar Savic; Caroline Diehl; Youngsun T Cho; Vinod Srihari; Peter T Morgan; John H Krystal; Xiao-Jing Wang; Grega Repovs; Alan Anticevic Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2016-10-10 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Sonia Bansal; Gi-Yeul Bae; Kyle Frankovich; Benjamin M Robinson; Carly J Leonard; James M Gold; Steven J Luck Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2020-09-03
Authors: Britta Hahn; Benjamin M Robinson; Samuel T Kaiser; Alexander N Harvey; Valerie M Beck; Carly J Leonard; Emily S Kappenman; Steven J Luck; James M Gold Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2010-06-08 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: John D Murray; Alan Anticevic; Mark Gancsos; Megan Ichinose; Philip R Corlett; John H Krystal; Xiao-Jing Wang Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2012-11-29 Impact factor: 5.357