Literature DB >> 17803934

Teaching with evaluation in ants.

Thomas O Richardson1, Philippa A Sleeman, John M McNamara, Alasdair I Houston, Nigel R Franks.   

Abstract

Tandem running in ants is a form of recruitment in which a single well-informed worker guides a naive nestmate to a goal [1-8]. The ant Temnothorax albipennis recently satisfied a strict set of predefined criteria for teaching in nonhuman animals [9, 10]. These criteria do not include evaluation as a prerequisite for teaching [10]. However, some authors claim that true teaching is always evaluative, i.e., sensitive to the competence or quality of the pupil [11-13]. They then assume, on the premise that only humans are capable of making such necessarily complex cognitive evaluations, that teaching must be unique to humans. We conducted experiments to test whether evaluation occurs during tandem running, in which a knowledgeable ant physically guides a naive follower to a goal. In each experiment, we interrupted the tandem run by removing the tandem follower. The response of the leader was to stand still at the point where the tandem run was interrupted. We then measured how long the leader waited for the missing follower before giving up. Our results demonstrate T. albipennis performs three different kinds of evaluation. First, the longer the tandem has proceeded the longer the leader will wait for the follower to re-establish contact. Second, ant teachers modulate their giving-up time depending on the value of the goal. Finally, leaders have shorter giving-up times after unusually slow tandem runs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17803934     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.08.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  20 in total

Review 1.  Identifying teaching in wild animals.

Authors:  Alex Thornton; Nichola J Raihani
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Speed versus accuracy in decision-making ants: expediting politics and policy implementation.

Authors:  Nigel R Franks; François-Xavier Dechaume-Moncharmont; Emma Hanmore; Jocelyn K Reynolds
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Do ants make direct comparisons?

Authors:  Elva J H Robinson; Faith D Smith; Kathryn M E Sullivan; Nigel R Franks
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  On optimal decision-making in brains and social insect colonies.

Authors:  James A R Marshall; Rafal Bogacz; Anna Dornhaus; Robert Planqué; Tim Kovacs; Nigel R Franks
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Distributed leadership and adaptive decision-making in the ant Tetramorium caespitum.

Authors:  B Collignon; C Detrain
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Pro-sociality without empathy.

Authors:  Marco Vasconcelos; Karen Hollis; Elise Nowbahari; Alex Kacelnik
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Trail laying during tandem-running recruitment in the ant Temnothorax albipennis.

Authors:  Norasmah Basari; Benita C Laird-Hopkins; Ana B Sendova-Franks; Nigel R Franks
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2014-06-06

8.  Tandem Recruitment and Foraging in the Ponerine Ant Pachycondyla harpax (Fabricius).

Authors:  C Grüter; M Wüst; A P Cipriano; F S Nascimento
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 1.434

Review 9.  Natural pedagogy as evolutionary adaptation.

Authors:  Gergely Csibra; György Gergely
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Variation in contributions to teaching by meerkats.

Authors:  Alex Thornton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.