Literature DB >> 17799897

Earthquake hazard after a mainshock in california.

P A Reasenberg, L M Jones.   

Abstract

After a strong earthquake, the possibility of the occurrence of either significant aftershocks or an even stronger mainshock is a continuing hazard that threatens the resumption of critical services and reoccupation of essential but partially damaged structures. A stochastic parametric model allows determination of probabilities for aftershocks and larger mainshocks during intervals following the mainshock. The probabilities depend strongly on the model parameters, which are estimated with Bayesian statistics from both the ongoing aftershock sequence and from a suite of historic California aftershock sequences. Probabilities for damaging aftershocks and greater mainshocks are typically well-constrained after the first day of the sequence, with accuracy increasing with time.

Year:  1989        PMID: 17799897     DOI: 10.1126/science.243.4895.1173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  9 in total

1.  Earthquake prediction: the interaction of public policy and science.

Authors:  L M Jones
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Forecasting large aftershocks within one day after the main shock.

Authors:  Takahiro Omi; Yosihiko Ogata; Yoshito Hirata; Kazuyuki Aihara
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Earthquake forecasting during the complex Amatrice-Norcia seismic sequence.

Authors:  Warner Marzocchi; Matteo Taroni; Giuseppe Falcone
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 14.136

4.  Forecasting of the first hour aftershocks by means of the perceived magnitude.

Authors:  E Lippiello; G Petrillo; C Godano; A Tramelli; E Papadimitriou; V Karakostas
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  No Significant Effect of Coulomb Stress on the Gutenberg-Richter Law after the Landers Earthquake.

Authors:  Víctor Navas-Portella; Abigail Jiménez; Álvaro Corral
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Statistical bounds on how induced seismicity stops.

Authors:  Ryan Schultz; William L Ellsworth; Gregory C Beroza
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Nonlinear statistical damage constitutive model of granite based on the energy dissipation ratio.

Authors:  Xianliang Wang; Jianhai Zhang; Li Qian; Tianzhi Yao; Zuguo Mo; Jianhua He; Ru Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Dike intrusions during rifting episodes obey scaling relationships similar to earthquakes.

Authors:  L Passarelli; E Rivalta; A Shuler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The debate on the prognostic value of earthquake foreshocks: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Arnaud Mignan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.