Literature DB >> 17797457

Antigenic differences in the surfaces of hyphae and rhizoids in allomyces.

S A Fultz, A S Sussman.   

Abstract

Immunofluorescent techniques have demonstrated a difference in surface components of hyphae and rhizoids of Allomyces macrogynus. An antigenic component detected on the rhizoidal surface may be present, but masked, in the hyphal-wall matrix material. The system also allows visualization of the hyphal wall during aging, when changes from a smooth to a fissured surface are noted, and differences in adsorptive properties occur.

Entities:  

Year:  1966        PMID: 17797457     DOI: 10.1126/science.152.3723.785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  6 in total

1.  Cell wall formation in zoospores of Allomyces arbuscula. II. Development of surface structure of encysted haploid zoospores, rhizoids, and hyphae.

Authors:  M Kroh; H Hendriks; E G Kirby; M M Sassen
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 2.552

2.  Cell wall formation in zoospores of Allomyces arbuscula. I. Fine structural observations on encysting haploid zoospores.

Authors:  E G Kirby; M Kroh; M M Sassen
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1974-07-04       Impact factor: 2.552

3.  Attraction and attachment of zoospores of the parasitic chytrid Rozella allomycis in response to host-dependent factors.

Authors:  A A Held
Journal:  Arch Mikrobiol       Date:  1974-02-01

4.  A serological investigation of hyphal growth in Fusarium culmorum.

Authors:  R Marchant; D G Smith
Journal:  Arch Mikrobiol       Date:  1968

5.  Further environmental factors affecting the antigenicity of Trichophyton rubrum.

Authors:  D K Flaherty; R Burrell
Journal:  Mycopathol Mycol Appl       Date:  1970-12-28

6.  Factors affecting the antigenicity of Trichophyton rubrum.

Authors:  A J Stuka; R Burrell
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1967-10       Impact factor: 3.490

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.