Literature DB >> 1779418

A visually evoked escape response of the housefly.

M H Holmqvist1, M V Srinivasan.   

Abstract

Flies (Musca domestica) avoid danger by initiating a rapid jump followed by flight. To identify the visual cues that trigger the escape response in the housefly, we measured the timing and probability of escapes when the fly was presented with a variety of visual stimuli created by moving targets toward it. Our results show that an escape response is triggered by an approaching dark disk, but not by a receding dark disk. On the other hand, a bright disk elicits escape only when it recedes. A disk with black and white rings is less effective at eliciting escape than is a dark solid disk of the same size. This indicates that the darkening contrast produced by an approaching stimulus is a more crucial parameter than expansion cues contained in the optical flow. Escape is also triggered by a horizontally moving dark edge, but not by a moving bright edge or by a grating. An examination of several visual parameters reveals that the darkening contrast, measured from the onset of stimulation to the start of escape is nearly constant for a variety of stimuli that trigger escape reliably. Thus darkening contrast, coupled with motion may be crucial in eliciting the visually evoked escape response. Other visual parameters such as time-to-contact or target angular velocity seem to be relatively unimportant to the timing of escapes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1779418     DOI: 10.1007/bf00197657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  5 in total

1.  The thoracico-abdominal nervous system of an adult insect, Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M E POWER
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1948-06       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Cluster organization and response characteristics of the giant fiber pathway of the blowfly Calliphora erythrocephala.

Authors:  J J Milde; N J Strausfeld
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1990-04-01       Impact factor: 3.215

3.  Evaluation of optical motion information by movement detectors.

Authors:  W Reichardt
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  The optic flow field: the foundation of vision.

Authors:  D N Lee
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1980-07-08       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  The contrast sensitivity of fly movement-detecting neurons.

Authors:  D Dvorak; M V Srinivasan; A S French
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.886

  5 in total
  9 in total

1.  Complementary motion tuning in frontal nerve motor neurons of the blowfly.

Authors:  Isabella Kauer; Alexander Borst; Jürgen Haag
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Flight initiations in Drosophila melanogaster are mediated by several distinct motor patterns.

Authors:  J R Trimarchi; A M Schneiderman
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Response properties and receptive field organization of collision-sensitive neurons in the optic tectum of bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana.

Authors:  Hong-Jian Kang; Xiao-Hong Li
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.203

4.  Dynamic visual cues induce jaw opening and closing by tiger beetles during pursuit of prey.

Authors:  Daniel B Zurek; Madeleine Q Perkins; Cole Gilbert
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 5.  Parallel Computations in Insect and Mammalian Visual Motion Processing.

Authors:  Damon A Clark; Jonathan B Demb
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Visual projection neurons in the Drosophila lobula link feature detection to distinct behavioral programs.

Authors:  Ming Wu; Aljoscha Nern; W Ryan Williamson; Mai M Morimoto; Michael B Reiser; Gwyneth M Card; Gerald M Rubin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  A novel neuronal pathway for visually guided escape in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Haleh Fotowat; Amir Fayyazuddin; Hugo J Bellen; Fabrizio Gabbiani
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Visual approach computation in feeding hoverflies.

Authors:  Malin Thyselius; Paloma T Gonzalez-Bellido; Trevor J Wardill; Karin Nordström
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Active inference, stressors, and psychological trauma: A neuroethological model of (mal)adaptive explore-exploit dynamics in ecological context.

Authors:  Adam Linson; Thomas Parr; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 3.332

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.