Literature DB >> 17793989

Plant defense guilds.

P R Atsatt, D J O'dowd.   

Abstract

Optimal plant defense should incorporate any mechanisms that influence the feeding behavior of potential pests. From a diverse collection of examples suggesting that the defense of a plant may be improved in the company of specific neighbors, we discuss a framework of operational mechanisms that begin to clarify some aspects of the recognized influence of species diversity on herbivory. Neighbors serve as insectary plants for herbivore predators and parasites, and influence herbivore feeding behavior by repelling, masking, attracting, and decoying. Insectary plants lower the numerical response of herbivores by increasing the efficiency of their predators and parasites. Repellent plants primarily lower functional response by causing the predator to fail to locate or reject its normal prey. Attractant-decoy plants dilute herbivore impact by drawing off herbivores, either increasing or decreasing their numerical and functional response (or either). The concept of gene conservation guilds adds diversionary and delaying tactics to the adaptation-counteradaptation view of plant-herbivore coevolution. The useful life of a given gene for resistance may best be extended by mechanisms that disrupt genetic tracking (specialization) by herbivores. Some plants may remain inedible not because their chemistry or morphology represents an evolutionary impasse, but because they live in an environment that provides acceptable options of variable quality. Feeding environments that provide little or no choice promote specialization by forcing physiological adaptation. Conversely, the evolutionary momentum of specializing herbivores may be lowered by enhancing their susceptibility, either by selection against virulent individuals, or by decreasing the exposure frequency of susceptible genotypes. The latter mechanism of conserving susceptible individuals takes advantage of herbivore behavioral sensitivity to variable plant quality. Direct selection against virulent genotypes requires temporal cycling of the herbivore population between resistant and nonresistant hosts. Both events may occur within defense guilds that provide acceptable feeding options of similar but distinctive quality.

Year:  1976        PMID: 17793989     DOI: 10.1126/science.193.4247.24

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  64 in total

1.  Uncoupling of omnivore-mediated positive and negative effects on periphyton mats.

Authors:  Pamela Geddes; Joel C Trexler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-05-27       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Spatial associations among algae affect host use in a herbivorous marine amphipod.

Authors:  Alistair G B Poore
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  Trait divergence and indirect interactions allow facilitation of congeneric species.

Authors:  Elisa Beltrán; Alfonso Valiente-Banuet; Miguel Verdú
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Spatial interplay of plant competition and consumer foraging mediate plant coexistence and drive the invasion ratchet.

Authors:  John L Orrock; Marissa L Baskett; Robert D Holt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Spatially complex neighboring relationships among grassland plant species as an effective mechanism of defense against herbivory.

Authors:  Ling Wang; Deli Wang; Yuguang Bai; Yue Huang; Meng Fan; Jushan Liu; Yexing Li
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Competitors as accomplices: seaweed competitors hide corals from predatory sea stars.

Authors:  Cody S Clements; Mark E Hay
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Associational effects of plant defences in relation to within- and between-patch food choice by a mammalian herbivore: neighbour contrast susceptibility and defence.

Authors:  Ulrika Alm Bergvall; Pasi Rautio; Kari Kesti; Juha Tuomi; Olof Leimar
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-09-27       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 8.  The detoxification limitation hypothesis: where did it come from and where is it going?

Authors:  Karen J Marsh; Ian R Wallis; Rose L Andrew; William J Foley
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 9.  Dynamic scaling in chemical ecology.

Authors:  Richard K Zimmer; Cheryl Ann Zimmer
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Phase shift facilitation following cyclone disturbance on coral reefs.

Authors:  George Roff; Christopher Doropoulos; Mirta Zupan; Alice Rogers; Robert S Steneck; Yimnang Golbuu; Peter J Mumby
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.