Literature DB >> 1779210

Four versions of double effect.

D B Marquis1.   

Abstract

Recent discussions of the doctrine of double effect have contained improved versions of the doctrine not subject to some of the difficulties of earlier versions. There is no longer one doctrine of double effect. This essay evaluates four versions of the doctrine: two formulations of the traditional Catholic doctrine, Joseph Boyle's revision of that doctrine, and Warren Quinn's version of the doctrine. I conclude that all of these versions are flawed.

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Genetics and Reproduction; Philosophical Approach; Religious Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1779210     DOI: 10.1093/jmp/16.5.515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Philos        ISSN: 0360-5310


  5 in total

1.  The principle of double effect as a guide for medical decision-making.

Authors:  Georg Spielthenner
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2008-03-11

2.  Lifespan extension and the doctrine of double effect.

Authors:  Laura Capitaine; Katrien Devolder; Guido Pennings
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2013-06

3.  Knowing, Anticipating, Even Facilitating but Still not Intending: Another Challenge to Double Effect Reasoning.

Authors:  S Duckett
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 1.352

4.  Voluntary active euthanasia and the doctrine of double effect: a view from Germany.

Authors:  Martin Klein
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2004-09

5.  Double effect, all over again: the case of Sister Margaret McBride.

Authors:  Bernard G Prusak
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2011-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.