Literature DB >> 17786804

Perceived exertion of physical activity: negative association with self-rated fitness.

Mette Aadahl1, Michael Kjaer, Torben Jørgensen.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In epidemiological studies information on physical activity is often obtained by self-report questionnaires, assessing the type of activities performed, the absolute metabolic demand (metabolic equivalents), and the duration and frequency of the activities. As health benefits from physical activity are coupled to the relative intensity of the physical effort, we wanted to relate perceived exertion to self-reported fitness. AIM: To use a questionnaire for obtaining information on perceived exertion of physical activity in a population sample and to evaluate whether perceived exertion is associated with self-reported fitness.
METHODS: A total of 42 specific physical activities were included in a perceived exertion questionnaire that was sent by mail to 2,543 randomly selected men and women between 19 and 60 years of age. The participants were asked to rate activities by degree of perceived exertion on an 11-point box-scale. General linear regression analyses were undertaken with perceived exertion of the specific physical activities as outcome variables and age and self-rated fitness as determinants.
RESULTS: The response rate was 61.7% (n = 1,568) and 54.3% of the respondents were women. In men and women both, the perceived exertion of 40 out of 42 specific physical activities of low, moderate, and high absolute intensity was negatively associated with self-rated fitness level.
CONCLUSION: Perceived exertion is significantly associated with self-rated fitness level in both genders after adjustment for age. Self-rated fitness level seems to determine perception of exertion in leisure time, occupation, household, and transportation activities, whether of low, moderate, or high absolute intensity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17786804     DOI: 10.1080/14034940601181421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Public Health        ISSN: 1403-4948            Impact factor:   3.021


  7 in total

Review 1.  Physical Activity in Preventing Alzheimer's Disease and Cognitive Decline: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Stefano Brini; Hamid R Sohrabi; Jeremiah J Peiffer; Mira Karrasch; Heikki Hämäläinen; Ralph N Martins; Timothy J Fairchild
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Physical Activity Patterns of Latina Immigrants Living in Alabama.

Authors:  Sarah Katherine Sweatt; Amanda L Willig; April A Agne; Jamie L Powell; Andrea L Cherrington
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2015-09

3.  Negligible heat strain in armored vehicle officers wearing personal body armor.

Authors:  Ian B Stewart; Andrew P Hunt
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2011-07-31       Impact factor: 2.646

4.  Criterion validity of a 10-category scale for ranking physical activity in Norwegian women.

Authors:  Kristin B Borch; Ulf Ekelund; Søren Brage; Eiliv Lund
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 6.457

5.  Preconception leisure-time physical activity and family history of stroke and myocardial infarction associate with preterm delivery: findings from a Norwegian cohort.

Authors:  Tone Engen; Katrine Mari Owe; Julie Horn; Gerhard Sulo; Øyvind Erik Næss; Petur Benedikt Juliusson; Nils-Halvdan Morken; Grace Margrethe Egeland
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 3.105

6.  Proximal correlates of metabolic phenotypes during 'at-risk' and 'case' stages of the metabolic disease continuum.

Authors:  M T Haren; G Misan; J F Grant; J D Buckley; P R C Howe; A W Taylor; J Newbury; R A McDermott
Journal:  Nutr Diabetes       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 5.097

7.  Can Childcare Work Be Designed to Promote High Intensity Physical Activity for Improved Fitness and Health? A Proof of Concept Study of the Goldilocks Principle.

Authors:  Anders Fritz Lerche; Maja Vilhelmsen; Kathrine Greby Schmidt; Rasmus Kildedal; Natja Launbo; Pernille Kold Munch; Mark Lidegaard; Sandra Schade Jacobsen; Charlotte Lund Rasmussen; Svend Erik Mathiassen; Leon Straker; Andreas Holtermann
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.