Literature DB >> 17786751

Third and fourth year medical students' attitudes about and experiences with callousness: the good, the bad and the ambiguous.

Christy A Rentmeester1, Amy Badura Brack, Michael G Kavan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study solicits third and fourth year medical students' attitudes about and experiences with callousness.
METHODS: Medical students were asked to respond to an on-line survey assessing demographic information, their experiences with seeing callousness modeled by mentors and their attitudes about callousness. Participants included 74 students roughly split on gender and year in school.
RESULTS: A 2 x 2 between-subjects MANOVA was conducted (dependent variables--attitudes about and experiences with callousness; independent variables--gender and year in school). Significant results were found for gender; follow-up analyses revealed that women hold more unfavorable attitudes about callousness than men. Although students generally regarded callousness as undesirable, they reported seeing callousness modeled by their mentors 20% of the time across a variety of situations.
CONCLUSIONS: Students' attitudes about callousness are negative; women's attitudes are more negative than men's. Despite this, students (regardless of their demographic variations) regularly see it modeled by their mentors. Some students' narrative responses suggest they think being callous toward patients and colleagues can serve them well in some situations. The authors offer several questions to motivate further empirical and ethical inquiry into callousness and urge medical educators to consider its influence on students' conceptions of professionalism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17786751     DOI: 10.1080/01421590701418799

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  3 in total

1.  Does gender moderate medical students' assessments of unprofessional behavior?

Authors:  Terry D Stratton; Rosemarie L Conigliaro
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Evaluation of effectiveness of instruction and study habits in two consecutive clinical semesters of the medical curriculum Munich (MeCuM) reveals the need for more time for self study and higher frequency of assessment.

Authors:  Sophia Mueller; Nina Weichert; Veit Stoecklein; Ariane Hammitzsch; Giulia Pascuito; Christian Krug; Matthias Holzer; Mona Pfeiffer; Matthias Siebeck; Ralf Schmidmaier
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Cross-cultural perspectives on the patient-provider relationship: a qualitative study exploring reflections from Ghanaian medical students following a clinical rotation in the United States.

Authors:  Nauzley C Abedini; Sandra Danso-Bamfo; Joseph C Kolars; Kwabena A Danso; Peter Donkor; Timothy R B Johnson; Cheryl A Moyer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 2.463

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.