Literature DB >> 17786689

Anthropometric dimensions of male powerlifters of varying body mass.

Justin W L Keogh1, Patria A Hume, Simon N Pearson, Peter Mellow.   

Abstract

In this study, we examined the anthropometric dimensions of powerlifters across various body mass (competitive bodyweight) categories. Fifty-four male Oceania competitive powerlifters (9 lightweight, 30 middleweight, and 15 heavyweight) were recruited from one international and two national powerlifting competitions held in New Zealand. Powerlifters were assessed for 37 anthropometric dimensions by ISAK (International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry) level II and III accredited anthropometrists. The powerlifters were highly mesomorphic and had large girths and bony breadths, both in absolute units and when expressed as Z(p)-scores compared through the Phantom (Ross & Wilson, 1974). These anthropometric characteristics were more pronounced in heavyweights, who were significantly heavier, had greater muscle and fat mass, were more endo-mesomorphic, and had larger girths and bony breadths than the lighter lifters. Although middleweight and heavyweight lifters typically had longer segment lengths than the lightweights, all three groups had similar Zp-scores for the segment lengths, indicating similar segment length proportions. While population comparisons would be required to identify any connection between specific anthropometric dimensions that confer a competitive advantage to the expression of maximal strength, anthropometric profiling may prove useful for talent identification and for the assessment of training progression in powerlifting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17786689     DOI: 10.1080/02640410601059630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  8 in total

Review 1.  Unique aspects of competitive weightlifting: performance, training and physiology.

Authors:  Adam Storey; Heather K Smith
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  On self-propagating methodological flaws in performance normalization for strength and power sports.

Authors:  Ognjen Arandjelović
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  The Epidemiology of Injuries Across the Weight-Training Sports.

Authors:  Justin W L Keogh; Paul W Winwood
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  What are the odds? Identifying factors related to competitive success in powerlifting.

Authors:  Daniel J van den Hoek; Patrick J Owen; Joel M Garrett; Robert J Howells; Joshua Pearson; Jemima G Spathis; Christopher Latella
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-06-19

5.  Short-Term Seasonal Development of Anthropometry, Body Composition, Physical Fitness, and Sport-Specific Performance in Young Olympic Weightlifters.

Authors:  Helmi Chaabene; Olaf Prieske; Melanie Lesinski; Ingo Sandau; Urs Granacher
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-30

6.  Lung Function and Respiratory Muscle Adaptations of Endurance- and Strength-Trained Males.

Authors:  Daniel A Hackett
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-10

7.  Does Dominant Somatotype Differentiate Performance of Jumping and Sprinting Variables in Young Healthy Adults?

Authors:  Fahri Safa Cinarli; Hakan Buyukcelebi; Ozcan Esen; Magdalena Barasinska; Ladislav Cepicka; Tomasz Gabrys; Umut Nalbant; Raci Karayigit
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  Somatotype, body composition and proportionality in polish top greco-roman wrestlers.

Authors:  Katarzyna L Sterkowicz-Przybycień; Stanisław Sterkowicz; Ryszard T Zarów
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 2.193

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.