BACKGROUND: We evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation for patients with locally unresectable pancreatic cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From October 2000 to August 2006, 245 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma underwent surgical exploration at our institution. Of these, 78 patients (32%) had undergone neoadjuvant therapy for initially unresectable disease, whereas the remaining patients (serving as the control group) were explored at presentation (n=167). All neoadjuvant patients received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy, often in conjunction with docetaxal and capecitabine in a regimen called GTX (81%). Seventy-five percent of neoadjuvant patients also received preoperative abdominal radiation (5,040 rad). RESULTS: Neoadjuvant patients were younger than control-group patients (60.8 vs 66.2 years, respectively, p<0.002). Seventy-six percent of neoadjuvant patients were resected as compared to 83% of control patients (NS). Concomitant vascular resection was required in 76% of neoadjuvant patients but only 20% of NS (p<0.01). Complications were more frequent in the neoadjuvant group (44.1 vs 30.9%, p<0.05), and mortality was higher (10.2 vs 2.9%, p<0.03). Among the neoadjuvant patients, all but one of the deaths were in patients that underwent arterial reconstruction. Mortality for patients undergoing a standard pancreatectomy without vascular resection was 0.8% in this series. Of patients resected, negative margins were achieved in 84.7% of neoadjuvant patients and 72.7% of NS. Within the cohort of neoadjuvant patients, radiation significantly increased the complication rate (13.3 vs 54.6%, p<0.006), but did not affect median survival (512 vs 729 days, NS). Median survival for patients who received neoadjuvant therapy (503 days) was longer than NS that were found to be unresectable at surgery (192 days, p<0.001) and equivalent to NS that were resected (498 days). CONCLUSIONS: Resection rate, margin status, and median survivals were equivalent when neoadjuvant patients were compared to patients considered resectable by traditional criteria, demonstrating equal efficacy. Surgical resection with venous reconstruction following neoadjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality. This approach extended the boundaries of surgical resection and greatly increased median survival for the "inoperable" patient with advanced pancreatic cancer.
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation for patients with locally unresectable pancreatic cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From October 2000 to August 2006, 245 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma underwent surgical exploration at our institution. Of these, 78 patients (32%) had undergone neoadjuvant therapy for initially unresectable disease, whereas the remaining patients (serving as the control group) were explored at presentation (n=167). All neoadjuvant patients received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy, often in conjunction with docetaxal and capecitabine in a regimen called GTX (81%). Seventy-five percent of neoadjuvant patients also received preoperative abdominal radiation (5,040 rad). RESULTS: Neoadjuvant patients were younger than control-group patients (60.8 vs 66.2 years, respectively, p<0.002). Seventy-six percent of neoadjuvant patients were resected as compared to 83% of control patients (NS). Concomitant vascular resection was required in 76% of neoadjuvant patients but only 20% of NS (p<0.01). Complications were more frequent in the neoadjuvant group (44.1 vs 30.9%, p<0.05), and mortality was higher (10.2 vs 2.9%, p<0.03). Among the neoadjuvant patients, all but one of the deaths were in patients that underwent arterial reconstruction. Mortality for patients undergoing a standard pancreatectomy without vascular resection was 0.8% in this series. Of patients resected, negative margins were achieved in 84.7% of neoadjuvant patients and 72.7% of NS. Within the cohort of neoadjuvant patients, radiation significantly increased the complication rate (13.3 vs 54.6%, p<0.006), but did not affect median survival (512 vs 729 days, NS). Median survival for patients who received neoadjuvant therapy (503 days) was longer than NS that were found to be unresectable at surgery (192 days, p<0.001) and equivalent to NS that were resected (498 days). CONCLUSIONS: Resection rate, margin status, and median survivals were equivalent when neoadjuvant patients were compared to patients considered resectable by traditional criteria, demonstrating equal efficacy. Surgical resection with venous reconstruction following neoadjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality. This approach extended the boundaries of surgical resection and greatly increased median survival for the "inoperable" patient with advanced pancreatic cancer.
Authors: David R Fogelman; Johnson Chen; John A Chabot; John D Allendorf; Beth A Schrope; Ronald D Ennis; Stephen M Schreibman; Robert L Fine Journal: Surg Oncol Clin N Am Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 3.495
Authors: A W Blackstock; S A Bernard; F Richards; K S Eagle; L D Case; M E Poole; P D Savage; J E Tepper Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: John B Ammori; Lisa M Colletti; Mark M Zalupski; Frederic E Eckhauser; Joel K Greenson; Justin Dimick; Theodore S Lawrence; Cornelius J McGinn Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2003 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Elizabeth Ward; Taylor Murray; Jiaquan Xu; Carol Smigal; Michael J Thun Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2006 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Robert L Fine; David R Fogelman; Stephen M Schreibman; Manisha Desai; William Sherman; James Strauss; Susan Guba; Riolan Andrade; John Chabot Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2007-04-18 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Mohammad H Jamal; Suhail A Doi; Eve Simoneau; Jad Abou Khalil; Mazen Hassanain; Prosanto Chaudhury; Jean Tchervenkov; Peter Metrakos; Jeffrey S Barkun Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Charles C Hsu; Christopher L Wolfgang; Daniel A Laheru; Timothy M Pawlik; Michael J Swartz; Jordan M Winter; Raymond Robinson; Barish H Edil; Amol K Narang; Michael A Choti; Ralph H Hruban; John L Cameron; Richard D Schulick; Joseph M Herman Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2012-02-07 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Marc W Fromer; Jenci Hawthorne; Prejesh Philips; Michael E Egger; Charles R Scoggins; Kelly M McMasters; Robert C G Martin Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2021-06-04 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Irmina Gawlas; Irene Epelboym; Megan Winner; Joseph DiNorcia; Yanghee Woo; James L Lee; Beth A Schrope; John A Chabot; John D Allendorf Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2013-10-10 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Irene Epelboym; J DiNorcia; M Winner; M K Lee; J A Lee; B A Schrope; J A Chabot; J D Allendorf Journal: World J Surg Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Harvey J Mamon; Donna Niedzwiecki; Donna Hollis; Benjamin R Tan; Robert J Mayer; Joel E Tepper; Richard M Goldberg; A William Blackstock; Charles S Fuchs Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-12-23 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Jason W Denbo; Morgan L Bruno; Jordan M Cloyd; Laura Prakash; Jeffrey E Lee; Michael Kim; Christopher H Crane; Eugene J Koay; Sunil Krishnan; Prajnan Das; Bruce D Minsky; Gauri Varadhachary; Rachna Shroff; Robert Wolff; Milind Javle; Michael J Overman; David Fogelman; Thomas A Aloia; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Jason B Fleming; Matthew H G Katz Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2016-10-11 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Jerome Martin Laurence; Peter Duy Tran; Kavita Morarji; Guy D Eslick; Vincent Wai To Lam; Charbel Sandroussi Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2011-09-13 Impact factor: 3.452