Literature DB >> 17785566

Significance of HER2 low-level copy gain in Barrett's cancer: implications for fluorescence in situ hybridization testing in tissues.

Sandra Rauser1, Roland Weis, Herbert Braselmann, Marcus Feith, Hubert J Stein, Rupert Langer, Peter Hutzler, Michael Hausmann, Silke Lassmann, Jörg Rüdiger Siewert, Heinz Höfler, Martin Werner, Axel Walch.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: HER2 may be a relevant biomarker in Barrett's cancer. We compared three HER2 laboratory methods, standard fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), image-based three-dimensional FISH in thick (16 microm) sections, and immunohistochemistry, to predict patient outcome. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Tissue microarray sections from 124 Barrett's cancer patients were analyzed by standard FISH on thin (4 microm) sections and by image-based three-dimensional FISH on thick (16 microm) sections for HER2 and chromosome-17, as well for p185(HER2) by immunohistochemistry. Correlations with clinical and follow-up data were examined.
RESULTS: Only three-dimensional FISH on thick (16 microm) sections revealed HER2 gene copy gain to be associated with increased disease-specific mortality (relative risk, 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-4.26; P = 0.033). In contrast, standard FISH on thin (4 microm) sections and immunohistochemistry failed to predict clinical outcome. Low-level gain of HER2 occurred frequently in Barrett's cancer (>or=2.5-4.0 HER2 copies, 59.7%; HER2-to-chromosome-17 ratio, >or=1.1-2.0; 61.2%) and defined a subpopulation for patient outcome as unfavorable as HER2 gene amplification [disease-free survival, P = 0.017 (HER2 copies)]. This low-level group was neither definable by standard FISH nor immunohistochemistry. No prognostic significance was found for chromosome-17 aneusomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Low-level copy gains of HER2 define a biologically distinct subpopulation of Barrett's cancer patients. Importantly, these subtle copy number changes are not reliably detected by standard FISH in thin (4 microm) tissue sections, highlighting a thus far unrecognized weakness in HER2 FISH testing. These results should be taken into account for accurate evaluation of biomarkers by FISH and for HER2 FISH testing in tissue sections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17785566     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  25 in total

1.  Image analysis of immunohistochemistry is superior to visual scoring as shown for patient outcome of esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Annette Feuchtinger; Tabitha Stiehler; Uta Jütting; Goran Marjanovic; Birgit Luber; Rupert Langer; Axel Walch
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 4.304

2.  Targeted endoscopic imaging.

Authors:  Meng Li; Thomas D Wang
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2009-04

Review 3.  [Update on Barrett esophagus and Barrett carcinoma].

Authors:  M Werner; S Laßmann
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.011

4.  HER2 amplification in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: correlation of two antibodies using gastric cancer scoring criteria, H score, and digital image analysis with fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  Oana M Radu; Tyler Foxwell; Kathleen Cieply; Sarah Navina; Sanja Dacic; Katie S Nason; Jon M Davison
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  In situ metabolomics of aldosterone-producing adenomas.

Authors:  Masanori Murakami; Yara Rhayem; Thomas Kunzke; Na Sun; Annette Feuchtinger; Philippe Ludwig; Tim Matthias Strom; Celso Gomez-Sanchez; Thomas Knösel; Thomas Kirchner; Tracy Ann Williams; Martin Reincke; Axel Karl Walch; Felix Beuschlein
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2019-09-05

6.  Targeted KRAS mutation assessment on patient tumor histologic material in real time diagnostics.

Authors:  Vassiliki Kotoula; Elpida Charalambous; Bart Biesmans; Andigoni Malousi; Eleni Vrettou; George Fountzilas; George Karkavelas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Analytical Validation of a Highly Quantitative, Sensitive, Accurate, and Reproducible Assay (HERmark) for the Measurement of HER2 Total Protein and HER2 Homodimers in FFPE Breast Cancer Tumor Specimens.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Larson; Laurie J Goodman; Yuping Tan; Lisa Defazio-Eli; Agnes C Paquet; Jennifer W Cook; Amber Rivera; Kristi Frankson; Jolly Bose; Lili Chen; Judy Cheung; Yining Shi; Sarah Irwin; Linda D B Kiss; Weidong Huang; Shannon Utter; Thomas Sherwood; Michael Bates; Jodi Weidler; Gordon Parry; John Winslow; Christos J Petropoulos; Jeannette M Whitcomb
Journal:  Patholog Res Int       Date:  2010-06-28

8.  TOPOIIalpha and HER-2/neu overexpression/amplification in Barrett's oesophagus, dysplasia and adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Elisa Rossi; Vincenzo Villanacci; Gabrio Bassotti; Francesco Donato; Andrea Festa; Gianpaolo Cengia; Salvatore Grisanti; Renzo Cestari
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 5.087

9.  HER2 status in Barrett's esophagus & esophageal cancer: a meta analysis.

Authors:  Ashwini Gowryshankar; Vinayak Nagaraja; Guy D Eslick
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-02

Review 10.  In vivo cancer biomarkers of esophageal neoplasia.

Authors:  Shaoying Lu; Thomas D Wang
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.