Literature DB >> 17785352

Risk factors for development of coronary heart disease in patients with acromegaly: a five-year prospective study.

Fausto Bogazzi1, Luigi Battolla, Cheti Spinelli, Giuseppe Rossi, Silvia Gavioli, Vitantonio Di Bello, Chiara Cosci, Chiara Sardella, Duccio Volterrani, Enrica Talini, Pasquale Pepe, Fabio Falaschi, Giuliano Mariani, Enio Martino.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data on coronary heart disease (CHD) are scanty and matter of argument in acromegalic patients.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate risk factors for development of CHD and the occurrence of cardiac events in acromegalic patients during a 5-yr prospective study.
DESIGN: Ten-year likelihood for CHD development was estimated by the Framingham scoring system (FS); patients were stratified as having low (FS < 10), intermediate (>or= 10 FS < 20), or high (FS >or= 20) risk. Coronary artery calcium content was measured using the Agatston score (AS) in all patients; those with positive AS were submitted to myocardial single-photon emission computed tomography; cardiac events were recorded during a 5-yr follow-up period. PATIENTS: Fifty-two consecutive patients (31 women, mean age 52 +/- 11 yr) with controlled or uncontrolled acromegaly were followed prospectively for 5 yr.
RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients (71%) had low, 14 patients (27%) had intermediate, and one patient (2%) had high CHD risk. CHD risk was unrelated to acromegaly activity or the estimated duration of disease. Among patients with FS less than 10%, 24 had AS equal to 0, eight had AS of 1 or greater and less than 100, and five had AS 100 or greater and less than 300, respectively. Among patients with FS 10 or greater and less than 20%, nine had AS equal to 0, two had AS of one or greater and less than 100, one had AS of 100 or greater and less than 300, and two had AS of 300 or greater; a patient of the latter group, having AS of 400 or greater, increased his CHD risk from 11% to 20% or more. FS or AS did not differ in patients with controlled or uncontrolled acromegaly (P = 0.981). All patients with positive AS had no single photon emission computed tomography perfusion defects. During the 5-yr follow-up period no patient developed ischemic cardiac events.
CONCLUSIONS: CHD risk in acromegalic patients, predicted by FS as in nonacromegalic subjects, is low; AS might have adjunctive role only in a subset of patients. However, most patients have systemic complications of acromegaly, which participate in the assessment of global CHD risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17785352     DOI: 10.1210/jc.2007-1213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  28 in total

1.  Changes in metabolic parameters and cardiovascular risk factors after therapeutic control of acromegaly vary with the treatment modality. Data from the Bicêtre cohort, and review of the literature.

Authors:  Claire Briet; Mirela Diana Ilie; Emmanuelle Kuhn; Luigi Maione; Sylvie Brailly-Tabard; Sylvie Salenave; Bertrand Cariou; Philippe Chanson
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 2.  Cardiovascular comorbidities in acromegaly: an update on their diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Ana M Ramos-Leví; Mónica Marazuela
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Effect of rosiglitazone on serum IGF-I concentrations in uncontrolled acromegalic patients under conventional medical therapy: results from a pilot phase 2 study.

Authors:  F Bogazzi; G Rossi; M Lombardi; F Raggi; C Urbani; C Sardella; C Cosci; E Martino
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 4.256

4.  Procalcitonin can be used as a marker of premature atherosclerosis in acromegaly.

Authors:  H Ozkan; O Celik; E Hatipoglu; F Kantarci; P Kadioglu
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.107

5.  Incidence of myocardial infarction and stroke in acromegaly patients: results from the German Acromegaly Registry.

Authors:  Christof Schöfl; David Petroff; Anke Tönjes; Martin Grussendorf; Michael Droste; Günter Stalla; Cornelia Jaursch-Hancke; Sylvère Störmann; Jochen Schopohl
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 6.  The cardiovascular system in growth hormone excess and growth hormone deficiency.

Authors:  G Lombardi; C Di Somma; L F S Grasso; M C Savanelli; A Colao; R Pivonello
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 4.256

7.  Arterial properties in acromegaly: relation to disease activity and associated cardiovascular risk factors.

Authors:  Marianna Yaron; Elena Izkhakov; Jessica Sack; Ibrahim Azzam; Etty Osher; Karen Tordjman; Naftali Stern; Yona Greenman
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 8.  Current perspectives on the impact of clinical disease and biochemical control on comorbidities and quality of life in acromegaly.

Authors:  Federico Gatto; Claudia Campana; Francesco Cocchiara; Giuliana Corica; Manuela Albertelli; Mara Boschetti; Gianluigi Zona; Diego Criminelli; Massimo Giusti; Diego Ferone
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 6.514

9.  Cardiovascular events in acromegaly: distinct role of Agatston and Framingham score in the 5-year prediction.

Authors:  Marta Ragonese; Angela Alibrandi; Gianluca Di Bella; Ignazio Salamone; Soraya Puglisi; Oana Ruxandra Cotta; Maria Luisa Torre; Francesco Ferrau; Rosaria Maddalena Ruggeri; Francesco Trimarchi; Salvatore Cannavo
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.633

10.  Does pegvisomant treatment expertise improve control of resistant acromegaly? The Italian ACROSTUDY experience.

Authors:  S Cannavo; F Bogazzi; A Colao; L De Marinis; P Maffei; R Gomez; E Graziano; M Monterubbianesi; S Grottoli
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 4.256

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.