Literature DB >> 17785335

Comparison of three multiplex immunoassays for detection of antibodies to extractable nuclear antibodies using clinically defined sera.

Susan S Copple1, Thomas B Martins, Charlin Masterson, Erwann Joly, Harry R Hill.   

Abstract

We set out to determine the agreement of three multiplex immunoassays for the detection of autoantibodies involved in connective tissue disease using clinically defined sera. Usefulness of the immunoassays will be defined by correlation to disease state. Using the immunoassays from Inova Diagnostics, Biomedical Diagnostics (BMD), and AtheNA, reactivity, to Smith (Sm), ribonucleic protein (RNP), SSA (Ro), SSB (La), Scl-70, and dsDNA or chromatin, we tested 273 clinically defined sera consisting of 57 systemic lupus erythrematosus (SLE) sera, 69 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) sera, 47 sera defined as various other connective tissue diseases, and 100 normal donor sera. Samples were also tested for anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) oN HEp-2 cells by IFA for analysis of discrepant results. Inova, BMD, and AtheNA assays demonstrated 57%, 89%, and 80% concordance, respectively, in the 47 connective tissue disease sera. The BMD assay was the most sensitive in detecting Scl-70. The immunoassays did not correlate well in the 57 SLE-defined sera; however, each had a variety of antibodies positive for each serum. The AtheNA assay demonstrated the highest degree of nonspecificity. Inova, BMD, AtheNA, and the Inova ANA HEp-2 IFA demonstrated 97%, 98%, 97%, and 99% specificity, respectively, using normal sera. Thus, all three assays showed a 97% or better negative predictive value. Positive correlation varied from 83% to 98%. Antibodies in SLE sera did not compare well among the three immunoassays. Significant variation in specificity and sensitivity due to individual characteristics of each assay was demonstrated, with the BMD assay showing the highest correlation with clinical diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17785335     DOI: 10.1196/annals.1398.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  14 in total

1.  Comparison of indirect immunofluorescence and multiplex antinuclear antibody screening in systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Victoria K Shanmugam; Donna R Swistowski; Nicole Saddic; Hong Wang; Virginia D Steen
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Autoimmunity in Human CE: Correlative with The Fertility Status of The CE Cyst.

Authors:  E A El Saftawy; A Abdelraouf; M A Elsalam; P Zakareya; A Fouad; E A Albadawi; A H S Abobakr Ali; N M Amin
Journal:  Helminthologia       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 1.176

3.  Anti-kelch-like 12 and anti-hexokinase 1: novel autoantibodies in primary biliary cirrhosis.

Authors:  Gary L Norman; Chen-Yen Yang; Heather P Ostendorff; Zakera Shums; Mark J Lim; Jinjun Wang; Amany Awad; Gideon M Hirschfield; Piotr Milkiewicz; Donald B Bloch; Kenneth J Rothschild; Christopher L Bowlus; Iannis E Adamopoulos; Patrick S C Leung; Harry J Janssen; Angela C Cheung; Catalina Coltescu; M Eric Gershwin
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 5.828

4.  Antinuclear antibodies in healthy people: the tip of autoimmunity's iceberg?

Authors:  David S Pisetsky
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 5.156

5.  Evaluation of ENA-6 Profile by ELISA Immunoassay in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematodes.

Authors:  Izeta Aganovic-Musinovic; Jasenko Karamehic; Lamija Zecevic; Faris Gavrankapetanovic; Nesina Avdagic; Asija Zaciragic; Tomislav Jukic; Nerima Grcic; Suvada Svrakic
Journal:  Autoimmune Dis       Date:  2012-10-11

6.  Antinuclear antibodies and their detection methods in diagnosis of connective tissue diseases: a journey revisited.

Authors:  Yashwant Kumar; Alka Bhatia; Ranjana Walker Minz
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2009-01-02       Impact factor: 2.644

Review 7.  The uses and misuses of multiplex autoantibody assays in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  Minoru Satoh; Shin Tanaka; Edward K L Chan
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 7.561

8.  A comparison of anti-nuclear antibody quantification using automated enzyme immunoassays and immunofluorescence assays.

Authors:  Renata Baronaite; Merete Engelhart; Troels Mørk Hansen; Gorm Thamsborg; Hanne Slott Jensen; Steen Stender; Pal Bela Szecsi
Journal:  Autoimmune Dis       Date:  2014-01-28

Review 9.  The spectrum of anti-chromatin/nucleosome autoantibodies: independent and interdependent biomarkers of disease.

Authors:  Sonal Mehra; Marvin J Fritzler
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 4.818

10.  Highlights on novel technologies for the detection of antibodies to Ro60, Ro52, and SS-B.

Authors:  M Infantino; C Bentow; A Seaman; M Benucci; F Atzeni; P Sarzi-Puttini; B Olivito; F Meacci; M Manfredi; M Mahler
Journal:  Clin Dev Immunol       Date:  2013-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.