Literature DB >> 17785036

Risk factors for clinical fractures among postmenopausal women: a 10-year prospective study.

Tineke A C M van Geel1, Piet P Geusens, Ivo F Nagtzaam, Danny J M van der Voort, Cyril M J R Schreurs, Paula E L M Rinkens, Geert-Jan Dinant.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Only scarce data are available on the long-term absolute risk (AR) of all clinical fractures, taking into account the time when they occurred. Therefore, we assessed during a 10-year follow-up the risk factors associated with the occurrence of any first or second clinical fracture. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a population-based study in 10 general practice centres. The sample comprised 2372 postmenopausal women, aged between 50 and 80 years at baseline, who completed a questionnaire about the incidence of radiographically confirmed fractures and fracture risks, analysed by multiple Cox regression. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: AR for any clinical fracture.
RESULTS: During the 10-year follow-up, 380 women (16%) had a fracture. A first fracture occurred in 267 women (11%). Osteoporosis at the lumbar spine (T-score <-2.5; hazard ratio (HR) 1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-2.3) and age over 60 years (HR1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.8) were the only risk factors retained in the Cox analysis. The AR in the lowest-risk group was 10%, and it was 23% in the highest-risk group. A second fracture occurred in 113 women during follow-up (5%). The time when a fracture occurred was the only risk factor retained in the Cox analysis. The AR for a second fracture was 41% in the five years after any first fracture before baseline and 25% if the first fracture had occurred earlier (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.7).
CONCLUSION: In postmenopausal women, over a 10-year follow-up, the AR of a second clinical fracture is highest in the five years after any first clinical fracture. The AR for a first clinical fracture is lower and depends on osteoporosis and age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17785036     DOI: 10.1258/175404507781605668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Menopause Int        ISSN: 1754-0453


  4 in total

Review 1.  Bone physiology, disease and treatment: towards disease system analysis in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Teun M Post; Serge C L M Cremers; Thomas Kerbusch; Meindert Danhof
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Treatment recommendations based on fracture risk status are not consistently provided in osteoporosis guidelines.

Authors:  Joanna E M Sale; Matthew Gray; Daniel Mancuso; Taucha Inrig; Gilles Boire; Marie-Claude Beaulieu; Larry Funnell; Earl Bogoch
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 3.  Calcium intake and risk of fracture: systematic review.

Authors:  Mark J Bolland; William Leung; Vicky Tai; Sonja Bastin; Greg D Gamble; Andrew Grey; Ian R Reid
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-09-29

4.  TOMOGRAFIC AND TENSIOMETRIC ASSESSMENT ON FEMURS FROM OOPHORECTOMIZED RATS SUBJECTED TO HORMONE REPLACEMENT THERAPY.

Authors:  Fábio Alexandre Martynetz; Maria de Lourdes Pessole Biondo-Simões; Juliano Rodrigo Martynetz; Tatiana Daher Martynetz; Elise Zimerman; Heraldo Mello Neto
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-11-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.