Literature DB >> 1777804

Vertebrate craniofacial development: the relation between ontogenetic process and morphological outcome.

D M Noden1.   

Abstract

Many structures that are present, often transiently, in the head of extant vertebrate embryos appear to be segmentally organized. These include the brain, particularly the hindbrain (e.g., rhombomeres), and adjacent axial structures such as paraxial mesoderm (e.g., somites, somitomeres) and neural crest cells. Also present in the head are additional sets of serially arranged structures that develop in more ventral and lateral locations. Examples of these are epibranchial placodes, aortic arches, and pharyngeal pouches. All these embryonic structures are frequently used both individually and collectively as characters to assist in defining homologies. New cell labeling and identification methods are providing detailed accounts of cell movements and tissue lineages that reveal a range of disparate behaviors not previously appreciated. The well-known migrations of neural crest cells bring all but the neurogenic members of this mesenchymal population form dorsal, axial locations into ventral and rostral locations where they largely surround the pharynx, stomdeum, and prosencephalon. Equally dramatic movements of neural plate cells, myoblasts, angioblasts, and placode-derived cells have recently been documented. These movements may occur in concert with those of other nearby tissues (e.g., branchiomeric myoblasts, neural crest cells, and surface ectoderm) or may be independent (e.g., placodal neuroblasts). Migrating cells may be clustered and follow definable pathways towards their destination (e.g., neural crest cells), or they may be solitary and wander invasively without a prespecified destination (e.g., angioblasts). These extensive morphogenetic movements bring cells into contact with a greater variety of other tissues and matrix environments than has heretofore been recognized. Moreover, because of these rearrangements, the cells present in a particular location, such as a branchial arch, may trace their ancestry to many axial levels, which complicates the analyses of segmental relations. Comparative morphological studies of craniofacial development have recently been augmented by descriptions of the sites and times of expression of many matrix components, growth factors and their receptors, and regulatory genes. Particularly important has been the discovery of a network of genes called the homeobox family. These genes are similar in their sequence and their organization along a chromosome to genes that establish the spatial identity of prospective body parts in drosophila. The combination of cellular and molecular descriptive studies of vertebrate craniofacial development provide exciting opportunities to catalogue patterns of gene expression and morphogenesis during the gastrula, neurula, and early organogenesis stages. Moreover, such data form the basis for proposing and then testing hypotheses about the mechanisms controlling cell movements, tissue formation, and the assembly of functionally integrated sets of structures.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1777804     DOI: 10.1159/000114388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Behav Evol        ISSN: 0006-8977            Impact factor:   1.808


  18 in total

Review 1.  Relations and interactions between cranial mesoderm and neural crest populations.

Authors:  Drew M Noden; Paul A Trainor
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Taste receptor cells arise from local epithelium, not neurogenic ectoderm.

Authors:  L M Stone; T E Finger; P P Tam; S S Tan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Synchronized changes to relative neuron populations in postnatal human neocortical development.

Authors:  David L Cooper; James E Gentle; Ernest Barreto; James L Olds
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 4.  Reassessing the Dlx code: the genetic regulation of branchial arch skeletal pattern and development.

Authors:  Michael J Depew; Carol A Simpson; Maria Morasso; John L R Rubenstein
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 5.  The genetic basis of modularity in the development and evolution of the vertebrate dentition.

Authors:  D W Stock
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2001-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Expression of parathyroid hormone-related peptide (PthrP) and its receptor (PTH1R) during the histogenesis of cartilage and bone in the chicken mandibular process.

Authors:  Qiong Zhao; Philip R Brauer; Lei Xiao; Michael H McGuire; John A Yee
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Type II collagen distribution during cranial development in Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  D W Seufert; J Hanken; M W Klymkowsky
Journal:  Anat Embryol (Berl)       Date:  1994-01

8.  Mesenchyme-dependent BMP signaling directs the timing of mandibular osteogenesis.

Authors:  Amy E Merrill; B Frank Eames; Scott J Weston; Thayer Heath; Richard A Schneider
Journal:  Development       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 6.868

9.  Neuroembryology and functional anatomy of craniofacial clefts.

Authors:  Ember L Ewings; Michael H Carstens
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2009-10

10.  Upstream sequences of the myogenin gene convey responsiveness to skeletal muscle denervation in transgenic mice.

Authors:  A Buonanno; D G Edmondson; W P Hayes
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1993-12-11       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.