Literature DB >> 17777943

Radiological impact of airborne effluents of coal and nuclear plants.

J P McBride, R E Moore, J P Witherspoon, R E Blanco.   

Abstract

Radiation doses from airborne effluents of model coal-fired and nuclear power plants (1000 megawatts electric) are compared. Assuming a 1 percent ash release to the atmosphere (Environmental Protection Agency regulation) and 1 part per million of uranium and 2 parts per million of thorium in the coal (approximately the U.S. average), population doses from the coal plant are typically higher than those from pressurized-water or boiling-water reactors that meet government regulations. Higher radionuclide contents and ash releases are common and would result in increased doses from the coal plant. The study does not assess the impact of non-radiological pollutants or the total radiological impacts of a coal versus a nuclear economy.

Entities:  

Year:  1978        PMID: 17777943     DOI: 10.1126/science.202.4372.1045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  6 in total

1.  Assessment of elemental and NROM/TENORM hazard potential from non-nuclear industries in North Sinai, Egypt.

Authors:  A F El-Mekawy; H M Badran; M K Seddeek; T Sharshar; T Elnimr
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Characterization of land-based sources of pollution in Jobos Bay, Puerto Rico: status of heavy metal concentration in bed sediment.

Authors:  Dennis A Apeti; David R Whitall; Anthony S Pait; Angel Dieppa; Adam G Zitello; Gunnar G Lauenstein
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Health implications of increased coal use in the Western States.

Authors:  T L Guidotti
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1979-07

4.  Natural radionuclide of Po²¹⁰ in the edible seafood affected by coal-fired power plant industry in Kapar coastal area of Malaysia.

Authors:  Lubna Alam; Che Abd Rahim Mohamed
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 5.984

5.  Potential health and environmental effects of trace elements and radionuclides from increased coal utilization.

Authors:  R I Van Hook
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Cancer mortality in small areas around nuclear facilities in England and Wales.

Authors:  J A Baron
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.