Literature DB >> 1777794

Responses of dairy cows to badger urine and faeces on pasture with reference to bovine tuberculosis transmission.

P F Benham1, D M Broom.   

Abstract

Grazing cattle were observed when they encountered badger urine or faeces which, in all but the first study, came only from badgers which were not infected with bovine tuberculosis. The faeces were very strongly avoided and there was generally a strong avoidance of ingestion of badger urine. There was no evidence that cattle were attracted to badger latrines in an area where some infected badgers were present and cows actively avoided faeces up to 28 days old which was placed on grass turves or on pasture. 99.3% of cows took no bites from small grass plots contaminated with faeces and 88.7% of cows took no bites from urine-treated plots. There was generally avoidance of pasture treated with badger urine up to 14 days old. However, two cows out of 240 were willing to graze close to faeces and seven out of 240 were willing to graze near urine. Contaminated herbage was eaten most when attractive herbage became scarce. Wet weather did not reduce the strength of avoidance of urine. Some cows responded to badger urine, and to a lesser extent to faeces, by more sniffing, particularly when herbage was scarce. The odour of faeces, and sometimes that of urine, often resulted in the ejection of mouth contents. As a consequence of their avoidance of badger faeces and urine, the vast majority of cows are unlikely to contract tuberculosis from infected badgers by ingestion. Most cows totally avoid badger products so they are unlikely to be infected via inhalation. However, the small minority of unselective cows must be more at risk and this finding warrants further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1777794     DOI: 10.1016/0007-1935(91)90021-E

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Vet J        ISSN: 0007-1935


  5 in total

1.  Performance of a Noninvasive Test for Detecting Mycobacterium bovis Shedding in European Badger (Meles meles) Populations.

Authors:  Hayley C King; Andrew Murphy; Phillip James; Emma Travis; David Porter; Jason Sawyer; Jennifer Cork; Richard J Delahay; William Gaze; Orin Courtenay; Elizabeth M Wellington
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Use of cattle farm resources by badgers (Meles meles) and risk of bovine tuberculosis (Mycobacterium bovis) transmission to cattle.

Authors:  B T Garnett; R J Delahay; T J Roper
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  The role of badgers in the epidemiology of Mycobacterium bovis infection (tuberculosis) in cattle in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland: current perspectives on control strategies.

Authors:  Deirdre Ní Bhuachalla; Leigh Al Corner; Simon J More; Eamonn Gormley
Journal:  Vet Med (Auckl)       Date:  2014-12-19

4.  Combining epidemiological and ecological methods to quantify social effects on Escherichia coli transmission.

Authors:  Trevor S Farthing; Daniel E Dawson; Mike W Sanderson; Hannah Seger; Cristina Lanzas
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 3.653

5.  Patterns of direct and indirect contact between cattle and badgers naturally infected with tuberculosis.

Authors:  J A Drewe; H M O'Connor; N Weber; R A McDonald; R J Delahay
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 4.434

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.