Literature DB >> 1777540

Prenatal care use and health insurance status.

C N Oberg1, B Lia-Hoagberg, C Skovholt, E Hodkinson, R Vanman.   

Abstract

Many observers explain the prevalence of inadequate prenatal care in the United States by citing demographic or psychosocial factors. But few have evaluated the barriers faced by women with different health insurance status and socioeconomic backgrounds. In this study of 149 women at six hospitals in Minneapolis, insurance status was significantly related to the source of prenatal care (p less than .0001). Private physicians cared for 52 percent of privately insured, 23 percent of Medicaid-insured, and two percent of uninsured women. Public clinics were the primary source of care for Medicaid and uninsured women, who, compared to privately insured women, experienced longer waiting times (p less than .001) during prenatal visits and were more likely (p less than .01) to lack continuity of care with a provider. Multiple measures, including expanding Medicaid eligibility, may help correct these problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1777540     DOI: 10.1353/hpu.2010.0472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved        ISSN: 1049-2089


  2 in total

1.  Quantifying the adequacy of prenatal care: a comparison of indices.

Authors:  G R Alexander; M Kotelchuck
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  The Impact of the Affordable Care Act Young Adult Provision on Childbearing: Evidence From Tax Data.

Authors:  Bradley Heim; Ithai Lurie; Kosali Simon
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2018-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.