PROBLEM: Irrigated agriculture exposes rural people to health risks associated with vector-borne diseases and pesticides used in agriculture and for public health protection. Most developing countries lack collaboration between the agricultural and health sectors to jointly address these problems. APPROACH: We present an evaluation of a project that uses the "farmer field school" method to teach farmers how to manage vector-borne diseases and how to improve rice yields. Teaching farmers about these two concepts together is known as "integrated pest and vector management". LOCAL SETTING: An intersectoral project targeting rice irrigation systems in Sri Lanka. RELEVANT CHANGES: Project partners developed a new curriculum for the field school that included a component on vector-borne diseases. Rice farmers in intervention villages who graduated from the field school took vector-control actions as well as improving environmental sanitation and their personal protection measures against disease transmission. They also reduced their use of agricultural pesticides, especially insecticides. LESSONS LEARNED: The intervention motivated and enabled rural people to take part in vector-management activities and to reduce several environmental health risks. There is scope for expanding the curriculum to include information on the harmful effects of pesticides on human health and to address other public health concerns. Benefits of this approach for community-based health programmes have not yet been optimally assessed. Also, the institutional basis of the integrated management approach needs to be broadened so that people from a wider range of organizations take part. A monitoring and evaluation system needs to be established to measure the performance of integrated management initiatives.
PROBLEM: Irrigated agriculture exposes rural people to health risks associated with vector-borne diseases and pesticides used in agriculture and for public health protection. Most developing countries lack collaboration between the agricultural and health sectors to jointly address these problems. APPROACH: We present an evaluation of a project that uses the "farmer field school" method to teach farmers how to manage vector-borne diseases and how to improve rice yields. Teaching farmers about these two concepts together is known as "integrated pest and vector management". LOCAL SETTING: An intersectoral project targeting rice irrigation systems in Sri Lanka. RELEVANT CHANGES: Project partners developed a new curriculum for the field school that included a component on vector-borne diseases. Rice farmers in intervention villages who graduated from the field school took vector-control actions as well as improving environmental sanitation and their personal protection measures against disease transmission. They also reduced their use of agricultural pesticides, especially insecticides. LESSONS LEARNED: The intervention motivated and enabled rural people to take part in vector-management activities and to reduce several environmental health risks. There is scope for expanding the curriculum to include information on the harmful effects of pesticides on human health and to address other public health concerns. Benefits of this approach for community-based health programmes have not yet been optimally assessed. Also, the institutional basis of the integrated management approach needs to be broadened so that people from a wider range of organizations take part. A monitoring and evaluation system needs to be established to measure the performance of integrated management initiatives.
Authors: Flemming Konradsen; Wim van der Hoek; Donald C Cole; Gerard Hutchinson; Hubert Daisley; Surjit Singh; Michael Eddleston Journal: Toxicology Date: 2003-11-05 Impact factor: 4.221
Authors: Liu Qunhua; Kang Xin; Chao Changzhi; Feng Shengzheng; Li Yan; He Rongzhi; Zhang Zhihua; G Gibson; Kang Wenmin Journal: Acta Trop Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 3.112
Authors: Abdoulaye Diabate; Thierry Baldet; Fabrice Chandre; Martin Akoobeto; T Robert Guiguemde; Frédéric Darriet; Cécile Brengues; Pierre Guillet; Janet Hemingway; Graham J Small; Jean Marc Hougard Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Robert S McCann; Henk van den Berg; Peter J Diggle; Michèle van Vugt; Dianne J Terlouw; Kamija S Phiri; Aurelio Di Pasquale; Nicolas Maire; Steven Gowelo; Monicah M Mburu; Alinune N Kabaghe; Themba Mzilahowa; Michael G Chipeta; Willem Takken Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2017-09-22 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Stuart Batterman; Joseph Eisenberg; Rebecca Hardin; Margaret E Kruk; Maria Carmen Lemos; Anna M Michalak; Bhramar Mukherjee; Elisha Renne; Howard Stein; Cristy Watkins; Mark L Wilson Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2009-04-17 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Rabindra R Abeyasinghe; Gawrie N L Galappaththy; Cara Smith Gueye; James G Kahn; Richard G A Feachem Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-08-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Alistair B A Boxall; Anthony Hardy; Sabine Beulke; Tatiana Boucard; Laura Burgin; Peter D Falloon; Philip M Haygarth; Thomas Hutchinson; R Sari Kovats; Giovanni Leonardi; Leonard S Levy; Gordon Nichols; Simon A Parsons; Laura Potts; David Stone; Edward Topp; David B Turley; Kerry Walsh; Elizabeth M H Wellington; Richard J Williams Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2008-12-10 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Chantal Marie Ingabire; Emmanuel Hakizimana; Alexis Rulisa; Fredrick Kateera; Bart Van Den Borne; Claude Mambo Muvunyi; Leon Mutesa; Michelle Van Vugt; Constantianus J M Koenraadt; Willem Takken; Jane Alaii Journal: Malar J Date: 2017-10-03 Impact factor: 2.979