Literature DB >> 1776834

Breast cancer cell kinetics: immunocytochemical determination of growth fractions by monoclonal antibody Ki-67 and correlation with flow cytometric S-phase and with some features of tumor aggressiveness.

G Gasparini1, F Pozza, S Meli, M Reitano, G Santini, P Bevilacqua.   

Abstract

In operable breast cancer, cell kinetics can be utilized in the prediction of the clinical outcome of patients. The discovery of monoclonal antibodies recognizing antigens related to cell proliferation has permitted the assessment of cell kinetics by rapid and practical immunocytochemical methods. It is claimed that the Ki-67 mouse monoclonal antibody recognizes an antigen expressed in proliferating cells but not present in quiescent (G0) cells. To study the relationship between Ki-67 score and DNA flow cytometric S-Phase Fraction (SPF), the latter being one of the most widely used methods to assess cell kinetics, we compared these two techniques of measurement in 122 breast carcinomas using both for each specimen. In this series 90% of tumors were Ki-67 positive, with a median value of 7.5% (range 1% to 70%). DNA flow cytometric analysis revealed that 69 tumors (57%) were aneuploid, whereas 53 were diploid. The median SPF value was 8% for diploid and 15% for aneuploid tumors (range 2% to 32%). Ki-67 scores were significantly higher in the DNA aneuploid compared to the diploid carcinomas (p = 0.015). Overall, a good correlation was found between Ki-67 and SPF values both in diploid (r = 0.60) and in aneuploid (r = 0.38) tumors. High Ki-67 scores were associated with the presence of axillary lymph node metastases (p = 0.0023) and poor histologic differentiation (p = 0.0028). Menopausal status, tumor size and peritumoral vessel invasion were unrelated to the Ki-67 score. Over-expression of the Epidermal Growth Factor receptor (EGF-r) and the c-erbB-2 oncogene were not correlated with Ki-67 staining. In conclusion, in this study Ki-67 immunostaining correlated with other indices of cell proliferation (SPF and Grade) and with some features of tumor aggressiveness (DNA aneuploidy and lymph node metastases) but seemed to be independent of some biological markers (EGR-r and c-erbB-2). Since the major objective for assessing proliferative status in Stage I-II breast carcinoma is to determine prognosis, it will have to be evaluated whether the determination of the Growth Fraction has comparable or even greater prognostic value than other cell kinetics markers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1776834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  6 in total

1.  Immunohistochemical quantification of the vitamin B12 transport protein (TCII), cell surface receptor (TCII-R) and Ki-67 in human tumor xenografts.

Authors:  Annette M Sysel; Victor E Valli; Ray B Nagle; Joseph A Bauer
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.480

2.  Long term prognostic value of growth fraction determination by Ki-67 immunostaining in primary operable breast cancer.

Authors:  J Y Pierga; A Leroyer; P Viehl; V Mosseri; S Chevillard; H Magdelénat
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Patterns of epidermal growth factor receptor amplification in malignant gliomas.

Authors:  G Sauter; T Maeda; F M Waldman; R L Davis; B G Feuerstein
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  Heterogeneity of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Tumours and the Surrounding Stroma for Prediction of Ki-67 Proliferation Status in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ming Fan; Ting He; Peng Zhang; Juan Zhang; Lihua Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Prognostic value of Ki-67 immunolabelling in primary operable breast cancer.

Authors:  M Railo; S Nordling; K von Boguslawsky; M Leivonen; L Kyllönen; K von Smitten
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  High-throughput automated scoring of Ki67 in breast cancer tissue microarrays from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium.

Authors:  Mustapha Abubakar; William J Howat; Frances Daley; Lila Zabaglo; Leigh-Anne McDuffus; Fiona Blows; Penny Coulson; H Raza Ali; Javier Benitez; Roger Milne; Herman Brenner; Christa Stegmaier; Arto Mannermaa; Jenny Chang-Claude; Anja Rudolph; Peter Sinn; Fergus J Couch; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Peter Devilee; Jonine Figueroa; Mark E Sherman; Jolanta Lissowska; Stephen Hewitt; Diana Eccles; Maartje J Hooning; Antoinette Hollestelle; John Wm Martens; Carolien Hm van Deurzen; Manjeet K Bolla; Qin Wang; Michael Jones; Minouk Schoemaker; Annegien Broeks; Flora E van Leeuwen; Laura Van't Veer; Anthony J Swerdlow; Nick Orr; Mitch Dowsett; Douglas Easton; Marjanka K Schmidt; Paul D Pharoah; Montserrat Garcia-Closas
Journal:  J Pathol Clin Res       Date:  2016-04-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.