Stephen B Freedman1, Vidhi A Thakkar. 1. Division of Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada. stephen.freedman@sickkids.ca
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of a regionalized system to safely transfer patients requiring admission from a referral center to either regional or community hospitals. DESIGN: Cohort study of children requiring admission. Following transfer, a questionnaire was administered to eligible caregivers. Subsequent emergency department (ED) use was assessed by comparing children who were transferred with those who were not. SETTING: The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, from April 1, 2003, through March 31, 2004. PARTICIPANTS: Caregivers of 371 children who underwent transfer from a tertiary care center ED to either a regional or a community hospital were eligible; 344 were contacted. Two hundred fifty-three children for whom transfer was considered but was not performed served as a comparison group. Intervention Questionnaire administered to caregivers, combined with database review. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Failure of the transfer process, caregiver satisfaction, and future tertiary care center ED use. RESULTS: Five children experienced intravenous access problems, and 4 children experienced delayed antibiotic administration. Caregiver satisfaction was 92.3% with the transfer process and 84.4% with the care at the receiving hospital. Forty-seven percent of caregivers indicated that they would agree to a similar transfer in the future. Two years later, fewer transferred children (39.9%) than those who were not transferred (49.6%) had revisited the tertiary care center ED (odds ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-2.10). The mean number of visits was unchanged (95% confidence interval of the difference, -0.44 to 0.21 visits). CONCLUSIONS: Although we found the redistribution program to be safe, caregivers stated a preference not to be transferred again. The redistribution system did not substantially alter tertiary care center ED use.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of a regionalized system to safely transfer patients requiring admission from a referral center to either regional or community hospitals. DESIGN: Cohort study of children requiring admission. Following transfer, a questionnaire was administered to eligible caregivers. Subsequent emergency department (ED) use was assessed by comparing children who were transferred with those who were not. SETTING: The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, from April 1, 2003, through March 31, 2004. PARTICIPANTS: Caregivers of 371 children who underwent transfer from a tertiary care center ED to either a regional or a community hospital were eligible; 344 were contacted. Two hundred fifty-three children for whom transfer was considered but was not performed served as a comparison group. Intervention Questionnaire administered to caregivers, combined with database review. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Failure of the transfer process, caregiver satisfaction, and future tertiary care center ED use. RESULTS: Five children experienced intravenous access problems, and 4 children experienced delayed antibiotic administration. Caregiver satisfaction was 92.3% with the transfer process and 84.4% with the care at the receiving hospital. Forty-seven percent of caregivers indicated that they would agree to a similar transfer in the future. Two years later, fewer transferred children (39.9%) than those who were not transferred (49.6%) had revisited the tertiary care center ED (odds ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-2.10). The mean number of visits was unchanged (95% confidence interval of the difference, -0.44 to 0.21 visits). CONCLUSIONS: Although we found the redistribution program to be safe, caregivers stated a preference not to be transferred again. The redistribution system did not substantially alter tertiary care center ED use.
Authors: Christopher S Parshuram; Ann Bayliss; Janette Reimer; Kristen Middaugh; Nadeene Blanchard Journal: Paediatr Child Health Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 2.253
Authors: Andrea T Cruz; Stephen B Freedman; Dina M Kulik; Pamela J Okada; Alesia H Fleming; Rakesh D Mistry; Joanna E Thomson; David Schnadower; Joseph L Arms; Prashant Mahajan; Aris C Garro; Christopher M Pruitt; Fran Balamuth; Neil G Uspal; Paul L Aronson; Todd W Lyons; Amy D Thompson; Sarah J Curtis; Paul T Ishimine; Suzanne M Schmidt; Stuart A Bradin; Kendra L Grether-Jones; Aaron S Miller; Jeffrey Louie; Samir S Shah; Lise E Nigrovic Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2018-01-03 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Evan S Fieldston; Matthew Hall; Marion R Sills; Anthony D Slonim; Angela L Myers; Courtney Cannon; Susmita Pati; Samir S Shah Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-04-19 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jae Yun Ahn; Hyun Wook Ryoo; Jungbae Park; Jong Kun Kim; Mi Jin Lee; Jong-Yeon Kim; Sang Do Shin; Won Chul Cha; Jun Seok Seo; Young Ae Kim Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2016-03-22 Impact factor: 2.153