Literature DB >> 17767814

Standardized assessment of walking capacity after spinal cord injury: the European network approach.

H J A van Hedel1, M Wirz, V Dietz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: After a spinal cord injury (SCI), walking function is an important outcome measure for rehabilitation and new treatment interventions. The current status of four walking capacity tests that are applied to SCI subjects is presented: the revised walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI II), the 6 minute walk test (6MinWT), 10 meter walk test (10MWT) and the timed up and go (TUG) test. Then, we investigated which categories of the WISCI II apply to SCI subjects who participated in the European Multicenter Study of Human Spinal Cord Injury (EM-SCI), and the relationship between the 10MWT and the TUG.
METHODS: In the EM-SCI, the walking tests were applied 2 weeks and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after SCI. We identified the WISCI II categories that applied to the EM-SCI subjects at each time point and quantified the relationship between the 10MWT and the TUG using Spearman's correlation coefficients (rho) and linear regression.
RESULTS: Five WISCI II categories applied to 71% of the EM-SCI subjects with walking ability, while 11 items applied to 11% of the subjects. The 10MWT correlated excellently with the TUG at each time point (rho>0.80). However, this relationship changed over time. One year after SCI, the time needed to accomplish the TUG was 1.25 times greater than the 10MWT time. DISCUSSION: Some categories of the WISCI II appear to be redundant, while some discriminate to an insufficient degree. In addition, there appear to be ceiling effects, which limit its usefulness. The relationship between the 10MWT and TUG is high, but changes over time. We suggest that, at present, the 10MWT appears to be the best tool to assess walking capacity in SCI subjects. Additional valuable information is provided by assessing the needs for walking aids or personal assistance. To ensure comparability of study results, proposals for standardized instructions are presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17767814     DOI: 10.1179/016164107X230775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Res        ISSN: 0161-6412            Impact factor:   2.448


  19 in total

1.  Interventions to Reduce Spasticity and Improve Function in People With Chronic Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: Distinctions Revealed by Different Analytical Methods.

Authors:  Lynsey D Duffell; Geoffrey L Brown; Mehdi M Mirbagheri
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.919

2.  Ability of walking without a walking device in patients with spinal cord injury as determined using data from functional tests.

Authors:  Puttipong Poncumhak; Jiamjit Saengsuwan; Sugalya Amatachaya
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 3.  Assessment of disability in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Julio C Furlan; Vanessa Noonan; Anoushka Singh; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2010-08-28       Impact factor: 5.269

4.  The standing and walking assessment tool for individuals with spinal cord injury: A qualitative study of validity and clinical use.

Authors:  Kristin E Musselman; Jean-François Lemay; Kristen Walden; Anne Harris; Dany H Gagnon; Molly C Verrier
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.985

5.  A preliminary assessment of legged mobility provided by a lower limb exoskeleton for persons with paraplegia.

Authors:  Ryan J Farris; Hugo A Quintero; Spencer A Murray; Kevin H Ha; Clare Hartigan; Michael Goldfarb
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  Discriminative ability of the three functional tests in independent ambulatory patients with spinal cord injury who walked with and without ambulatory assistive devices.

Authors:  Wilairat Saensook; Puttipong Poncumhak; Jiamjit Saengsuwan; Lugkana Mato; Worawan Kamruecha; Sugalya Amatachaya
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.985

7.  Motor and gait improvement in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury induced by high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  J Benito; H Kumru; N Murillo; U Costa; J Medina; J M Tormos; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; J Vidal
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2012

Review 8.  Supraspinal Control Predicts Locomotor Function and Forecasts Responsiveness to Training after Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Edelle C Field-Fote; Jaynie F Yang; D Michele Basso; Monica A Gorassini
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 5.269

9.  Visuotemporal cues clinically improved walking ability of ambulatory patients with spinal cord injury within 5 days.

Authors:  Noppol Pramodhyakul; Pipatana Amatachaya; Thanat Sooknuan; Preeda Arayawichanon; Sugalya Amatachaya
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 1.985

10.  HAL® exoskeleton training improves walking parameters and normalizes cortical excitability in primary somatosensory cortex in spinal cord injury patients.

Authors:  Matthias Sczesny-Kaiser; Oliver Höffken; Mirko Aach; Oliver Cruciger; Dennis Grasmücke; Renate Meindl; Thomas A Schildhauer; Peter Schwenkreis; Martin Tegenthoff
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.