Literature DB >> 17767509

Noise-improved signal detection in cat primary visual cortex via a well-balanced stochastic resonance-like procedure.

Klaus Funke1, Nicolas J Kerscher, Florentin Wörgötter.   

Abstract

Adding noise to a weak signal can paradoxically improve signal detection, a process called 'stochastic resonance' (SR). In the visual system, noise might be introduced by the image jitter resulting from high-frequency eye movements, like eye microtremor and microsaccades. To test whether this kind of noise might be beneficial or detrimental for cortical signal detection, we performed single-unit recordings from area 17 of anaesthetized cats while jittering the visual stimulus in a frequency and amplitude range resembling the possible range of eye movements. We used weak, sub- and peri-threshold visual stimuli, on top of which we superimposed noise with variable jitter amplitude. In accordance with the typical SR effect, we found that small noise levels actually increased the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of previously weak cortical visual responses, while originally strong responses were little affected or even reduced. Above a certain noise level, the SNR dropped a little, but not as a result of increased background activity - as would be proposed by SR theory - but because of a lowered response to signal and noise. Therefore, it seems that the ascending visual pathway optimally utilizes signal detection improvement by a SR-like process, while at the same time preventing spurious noise-induced activity and keeping the SNR sufficiently high.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17767509     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05735.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  13 in total

1.  Network recruitment to coherent oscillations in a hippocampal computer model.

Authors:  William C Stacey; Abba Krieger; Brian Litt
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Differential brain activity states during the perception and nonperception of illusory motion as revealed by magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  David A Crowe; Arthur C Leuthold; Apostolos P Georgopoulos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  The divisive normalization model of V1 neurons: a comprehensive comparison of physiological data and model predictions.

Authors:  Tadamasa Sawada; Alexander A Petrov
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Effects of Stochastic Vestibular Galvanic Stimulation and LDOPA on Balance and Motor Symptoms in Patients With Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Ghazaleh Samoudi; Maria Jivegård; Ajitkumar P Mulavara; Filip Bergquist
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  Effector-dependent stochastic reference frame transformations alter decision-making.

Authors:  T Scott Murdison; Dominic I Standage; Philippe Lefèvre; Gunnar Blohm
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.004

6.  Synaptic noise and physiological coupling generate high-frequency oscillations in a hippocampal computational model.

Authors:  William C Stacey; Maciej T Lazarewicz; Brian Litt
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation promotes GABA release in the substantia nigra and improves locomotion in hemiparkinsonian rats.

Authors:  Ghazaleh Samoudi; Hans Nissbrandt; Mayank B Dutia; Filip Bergquist
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Control of in vivo ictogenesis via endogenous synaptic pathways.

Authors:  Hiram Luna-Munguia; Phillip Starski; Wu Chen; Stephen Gliske; William C Stacey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Simultaneous recordings of ocular microtremor and microsaccades with a piezoelectric sensor and a video-oculography system.

Authors:  Michael B McCamy; Niamh Collins; Jorge Otero-Millan; Mohammed Al-Kalbani; Stephen L Macknik; Davis Coakley; Xoana G Troncoso; Gerard Boyle; Vinodh Narayanan; Thomas R Wolf; Susana Martinez-Conde
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Effects of fixational eye movements on retinal ganglion cell responses: a modelling study.

Authors:  Matthias H Hennig; Florentin Wörgötter
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.