Literature DB >> 17766781

The role of genetic and sociopolitical definitions of race in clinical trials.

Perry W Payne1, Charmaine Royal.   

Abstract

Although the concept of race has been disputed for decades, race continues to be used as a variable in biomedical research. Public Law 103-43 calls on the National Institutes of Health to develop guidelines for defining "minority group" and "their subpopulations" for the purposes of ensuring that they are included in clinical trials. Current guidelines use census racial categories, even though these categories are labeled as not scientific by their creator, the Office of Management and Budget. Three policy options exist for improving the National Institutes of Health Policy on Reporting Race and Ethnicity: (1) using genetic ancestry instead of census racial categories;(2) developing a standardized definition of race using current science; and(3) redefining minority group populations and subpopulations using social environment variables rather than census racial categories.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17766781     DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200700001-00021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1067-151X            Impact factor:   3.020


  3 in total

1.  Identification of population substructure among Jews using STR markers and dependence on reference populations included.

Authors:  Jennifer B Listman; Deborah Hasin; Henry R Kranzler; Robert T Malison; Apiwat Mutirangura; Atapol Sughondhabirom; Efrat Aharonovich; Baruch Spivak; Joel Gelernter
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 2.797

2.  Perceptions of genetic testing and genomic medicine among drug users.

Authors:  David C Perlman; Camila Gelpí-Acosta; Samuel R Friedman; Ashly E Jordan; Holly Hagan
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2014-06-24

3.  The spectre of race in American medicine.

Authors:  Mariam O Fofana
Journal:  Med Humanit       Date:  2013-08-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.