Literature DB >> 17766409

Motility and chemotaxis in Agrobacterium tumefaciens surface attachment and biofilm formation.

Peter M Merritt1, Thomas Danhorn, Clay Fuqua.   

Abstract

Bacterial motility mechanisms, including swimming, swarming, and twitching, are known to have important roles in biofilm formation, including colonization and the subsequent expansion into mature structured surface communities. Directed motility requires chemotaxis functions that are conserved among many bacterial species. The biofilm-forming plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens drives swimming motility by utilizing a small group of flagella localized to a single pole or the subpolar region of the cell. There is no evidence for twitching or swarming motility in A. tumefaciens. Site-specific deletion mutations that resulted in either aflagellate, flagellated but nonmotile, or flagellated but nonchemotactic A. tumefaciens derivatives were examined for biofilm formation under static and flowing conditions. Nonmotile mutants were significantly deficient in biofilm formation under static conditions. Under flowing conditions, however, the aflagellate mutant rapidly formed aberrantly dense, tall biofilms. In contrast, a nonmotile mutant with unpowered flagella was clearly debilitated for biofilm formation relative to the wild type. A nontumbling chemotaxis mutant was only weakly affected with regard to biofilm formation under nonflowing conditions but was notably compromised in flow, generating less adherent biomass than the wild type, with a more dispersed cellular arrangement. Extragenic suppressor mutants of the chemotaxis-impaired, straight-swimming phenotype were readily isolated from motility agar plates. These mutants regained tumbling at a frequency similar to that of the wild type. Despite this phenotype, biofilm formation by the suppressor mutants in static cultures was significantly deficient. Under flowing conditions, a representative suppressor mutant manifested a phenotype similar to yet distinct from that of its nonchemotactic parent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17766409      PMCID: PMC2168663          DOI: 10.1128/JB.00566-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  43 in total

1.  Splicing by overlap extension by PCR using asymmetric amplification: an improved technique for the generation of hybrid proteins of immunological interest.

Authors:  A N Warrens; M D Jones; R I Lechler
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1997-02-20       Impact factor: 3.688

2.  Migration of bacteria in semisolid agar.

Authors:  A J Wolfe; H C Berg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Opine catabolic loci from Agrobacterium plasmids confer chemotaxis to their cognate substrates.

Authors:  H Kim; S K Farrand
Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.171

Review 4.  Bacterial chemotaxis: Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Sinorhizobium meliloti--variations on a theme?

Authors:  Judith P Armitage; Rudiger Schmitt
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.777

5.  Quorum sensing and motility mediate interactions between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Agrobacterium tumefaciens in biofilm cocultures.

Authors:  Dingding An; Thomas Danhorn; Clay Fuqua; Matthew R Parsek
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Agrobacterium tumefaciens as an agent of disease.

Authors:  Matthew A Escobar; Abhaya M Dandekar
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 18.313

7.  Genetic evidence that the Vibrio cholerae monolayer is a distinct stage in biofilm development.

Authors:  Sudha Moorthy; Paula I Watnick
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.501

8.  virA and virG are the Ti-plasmid functions required for chemotaxis of Agrobacterium tumefaciens towards acetosyringone.

Authors:  C H Shaw; A M Ashby; A Brown; C Royal; G J Loake; C H Shaw
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.501

9.  Aeromonas flagella (polar and lateral) are enterocyte adhesins that contribute to biofilm formation on surfaces.

Authors:  Sylvia M Kirov; Marika Castrisios; Jonathan G Shaw
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.441

10.  The FNR-type transcriptional regulator SinR controls maturation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens biofilms.

Authors:  Bronwyn E Ramey; Ann G Matthysse; Clay Fuqua
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.501

View more
  79 in total

1.  A cooperative virulence plasmid imposes a high fitness cost under conditions that induce pathogenesis.

Authors:  Thomas G Platt; James D Bever; Clay Fuqua
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Functional genomics of probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 and 83972, and UPEC strain CFT073: comparison of transcriptomes, growth and biofilm formation.

Authors:  Viktoria Hancock; Rebecca Munk Vejborg; Per Klemm
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.291

Review 3.  Chemotaxis Control of Transient Cell Aggregation.

Authors:  Gladys Alexandre
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Diffusion of Bacterial Cells in Porous Media.

Authors:  Nicholas A Licata; Bitan Mohari; Clay Fuqua; Sima Setayeshgar
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Adhesins Involved in Attachment to Abiotic Surfaces by Gram-Negative Bacteria.

Authors:  Cécile Berne; Adrien Ducret; Gail G Hardy; Yves V Brun
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2015-08

6.  A MotN mutant of Ralstonia solanacearum is hypermotile and has reduced virulence.

Authors:  Fanhong Meng; Jian Yao; Caitilyn Allen
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Absence of the Polar Organizing Protein PopZ Results in Reduced and Asymmetric Cell Division in Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

Authors:  Matthew Howell; Alena Aliashkevich; Anne K Salisbury; Felipe Cava; Grant R Bowman; Pamela J B Brown
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Signals, regulatory networks, and materials that build and break bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  Ece Karatan; Paula Watnick
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 11.056

9.  Feedback regulation of Caulobacter crescentus holdfast synthesis by flagellum assembly via the holdfast inhibitor HfiA.

Authors:  Cécile Berne; Courtney K Ellison; Radhika Agarwal; Geoffrey B Severin; Aretha Fiebig; Robert I Morton; Christopher M Waters; Yves V Brun
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 3.501

10.  A Cardiolipin-Deficient Mutant of Rhodobacter sphaeroides Has an Altered Cell Shape and Is Impaired in Biofilm Formation.

Authors:  Ti-Yu Lin; Thiago M A Santos; Wayne S Kontur; Timothy J Donohue; Douglas B Weibel
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.