Literature DB >> 17766315

How do quantities drunk per drinking day and the frequencies of drinking those quantities contribute to self-reported harm and positive consequences?

Pia Mäkelä1, Heli Mustonen.   

Abstract

AIMS: This article examines how quantities drunk per drinking day (dose) and the frequency of drinking those quantities affect self-reported harm and positive consequences at the individual and population level.
METHODS: Participants were drinkers in a general population survey among Finns aged 15-69 years, conducted in 2000 (N = 1760, response rate 78%). Types of harm examined were self-reported worries over drinking control, negative consequences of individual drinking occasions, and external reactions to drinking.
RESULTS: Respondents who reported frequent drinking at very high doses (13 drinks and above for men, 8 and above for women) were in a league of their own with respect to the risk of harm. At the population level, the dose of 8-12 drinks accounted for most problems among men, and doses of 5-7 and 3-4 drinks among women. No gain in positive consequences was attached to drinking beyond the dose of 5-7 drinks among men and 3-4 drinks among women.
CONCLUSIONS: The dose level at which the population-level risk was the highest was lower than the level at which the individual-level risk was the highest, due to a greater prevalence of drinking the lesser quantities. Future studies should pay more attention to the separate effects of dose as well as the frequency of drinking the particular doses per occasion at the individual level, and also, as to how the prevalence of these drinking patterns contributes to the population-level risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17766315     DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agm066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol        ISSN: 0735-0414            Impact factor:   2.826


  3 in total

1.  A comparative evaluation of self-report and biological measures of cigarette use in nondaily smokers.

Authors:  Jennifer M Wray; Julie C Gass; Eleanor I Miller; Diana G Wilkins; Douglas E Rollins; Stephen T Tiffany
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2015-10-19

2.  Characterization of a functional polymorphism in the 3' UTR of SLC6A4 and its association with drinking intensity.

Authors:  Chamindi Seneviratne; Weihua Huang; Nassima Ait-Daoud; Ming D Li; Bankole A Johnson
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  A dose-response perspective on college drinking and related problems.

Authors:  Paul J Gruenewald; Fred W Johnson; William R Ponicki; Elizabeth A Lascala
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.526

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.