Literature DB >> 17765300

Assessment of polymerization contraction stress of three composite resins.

Milena Cadenaro1, Matteo Biasotto, Nicola Scuor, Lorenzo Breschi, Carel L Davidson, Roberto Di Lenarda.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to measure the development of contraction stress of three composite resin restorative materials during photo-polymerization: a micro-hybrid composite (Filtek Z250, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA); a nano-filled composite (Filtek Supreme, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA); and a low-shrinkage composite (AElite LS, Bisco Inc., Schaumburg, IL, USA).
METHODS: Curing shrinkage stress was measured using a stress-analyzer. Composites were polymerized with a halogen-curing unit (VIP, Bisco Inc., Schaumburg, IL, USA) for 40 s. The contraction force (N) generated during polymerization was continuously recorded for 150 s after photo-initiation. Contraction stress (MPa) was calculated at 20, 40, 60 and 150 s. Data were statistically analyzed.
RESULTS: The low-shrinkage composite AElite LS exhibited the lowest stress values compared to other materials (p<0.05). Statistical analysis did not show significant differences between Filtek Z250 and Filtek Supreme. SIGNIFICANCE: The low-shrinkage composite showed lower contraction stress than micro-hybrid and nano-filled composite. Ideally, non-shrinking resins would represent the ultimate solution to overcome polymerization contraction and stress-related problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17765300     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.06.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  6 in total

1.  Light polymerization during cavity filling: influence of total energy density on shrinkage and marginal adaptation.

Authors:  Tissiana Bortolotto; Federico Prando; Didier Dietschi; Ivo Krejci
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Microleakage of silorane- and methacrylate-based class V composite restorations.

Authors:  Stephanie Krifka; Marianne Federlin; Karl-Anton Hiller; Gottfried Schmalz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Comparative Evaluation of Internal Margin Adaptation and Integrity of Class I Preparations using Two Composites: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Subhasmita Bhol; Neha Patwa; Suprabha Sharan; Shemil Mohamed Sha; Muqthadir Siddiqui Mohammed Abdul; Alen Pius; Shalini Singh
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-06-05

Review 4.  Polymer-Based Direct Filling Materials.

Authors:  Carmem S Pfeifer
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2017-10

5.  Comparison of Microtensile Bond Strength of Silorane-Based Composite with the Conventional Methacrylate Composite to the Dentin of Primary Teeth.

Authors:  Sharifi M; Khoramian Tusi S
Journal:  J Dent Biomater       Date:  2016-12

Review 6.  Analytical methods for the measurement of polymerization kinetics and stresses of dental resin-based composites: A review.

Authors:  Mehrsima Ghavami-Lahiji; Tabassom Hooshmand
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.