Literature DB >> 1776412

Topographical analysis of peripheral vs central retina with pattern reversal visual evoked response and the scanning laser ophthalmoscope.

O Katsumi1, F J Van de Velde, M C Mehta, T Hirose.   

Abstract

The contribution of the central and the surrounding peripheral retina to the pattern reversal visual evoked response (PVER) was analyzed simultaneously using double frequency stimulation and the Fast Fourier transform (FFT) method. The Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope (SLO) was used to project the pattern stimulus, a square subtending 10 degrees on a side, on a specific location in the fundus and to monitor accurately the stimulus' position during PVER testing. When the stimulus area on the central retina was less than or equal to 50 min of arc on a side, or 0.69% of the total area was stimulated (a square of 10 degrees on a side), the contribution from the central retina was negligible, and the PVER was dominated by surrounding peripheral retinal activity. When the stimulus area of the central retina was greater than or equal to 100 min of arc on a side, or 2.78% of the whole area was stimulated, activity from the central retina became more evident. When the stimulus area projected on the central retina became 150 min on a side (6.25% of the area or greater), activity from the central retina showed an increase and exceeded that of the peripheral retina. When the central area became larger, its activity dominated the PVER, and the contribution from the peripheral retina became negligible at this stage. The PVER was highly dependent upon the activity of the central retina, and activity levels from the central and surrounding peripheral retina were correlated.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1776412     DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1991.tb04846.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)        ISSN: 0001-639X


  4 in total

1.  Objective measurement of contrast sensitivity function using contrast sweep visual evoked responses.

Authors:  J M Lopes de Faria; O Katsumi; M Arai; T Hirose
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Quadrant pattern ERG with SLO stimulation in normals and glaucoma patients.

Authors:  F Horn; C Mardin; M Korth; P Martus
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Differences between pattern-evoked electroretinograms obtained by a scanning laser ophthalmoscope and by a mechanical mirror system.

Authors:  F Horn; M Korth
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Colored focal visual evoked potentials by cathode ray tube versus scanning laser ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  F Rigaudière; J F Le Gargasson; J E Guez; Y Grall
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.