Literature DB >> 17764088

SMART (simultaneous modulated accelerated radiotherapy) for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinomas.

Woong Sub Koom1, Tae Hyun Kim, Kyung Hwan Shin, Hong Ryull Pyo, Joo-Young Kim, Dae Yong Kim, Myonggeun Yoon, Sung Yong Park, Dae Ho Lee, Jun Sun Ryu, Yoo Seok Jung, Sang Hyun Lee, Kwan Ho Cho.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is commonly used for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes of simultaneous modulated accelerated radiotherapy (SMART) with concurrent chemotherapy.
METHODS: Between January 2003 and May 2005, 24 patients with stage IIB to IVB NPC underwent SMART encompassing 3 targets: gross tumor volume (GTV), high-risk subclinical disease (CTV1), and low-risk subclinical disease (CTV2). Daily fractions of 2.4, 2.15, and 1.9 Gy were delivered to GTV, CTV1, and CTV2 to a total dose of 64.8, 58.05, and 51.3 Gy in 27 fractions over 5.5 weeks, respectively. Fifteen patients received concurrent cisplatin (DDP group), and 9 received 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin (FP group).
RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 26 months (range, 17-45 months), 3-year overall and local-, regional-, and distant-progression-free survivals were 96% and 93%, 87%, and 88%, respectively. Grade 3 acute mucositis and pharyngitis were observed in 16 (67%) and 14 (59%) patients, respectively. Severe acute mucositis (100% vs 47%) and pharyngitis (100% vs 34%) were more frequently observed in the FP group than the DDP group (p < .01).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite short follow-up with a small number of patients, our preliminary results demonstrated encouraging local-regional control and survival at the cost of modest increase in treatment related toxicities. The total dose and fractionation scheme of SMART used in our study is feasible with no life-threatening or fatal complications. However, the administration of fluorouracil in addition to cisplatin during SMART was associated with increased acute and late toxicities, and it should be administered with caution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17764088     DOI: 10.1002/hed.20667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Head Neck        ISSN: 1043-3074            Impact factor:   3.147


  5 in total

Review 1.  Balancing risk and reward in target delineation for highly conformal radiotherapy in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Avraham Eisbruch; Vincent Gregoire
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.934

2.  Post-treatment late complications of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Cheng-Chang Lee; Ching-Yin Ho
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Conventional 2D (2DRT) and 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal cancer treatment.

Authors:  Francesco Moretto; Monica Rampino; Fernando Munoz; Maria Grazia Ruo Redda; Alessia Reali; Vittoria Balcet; Serena Badellino; Cristina Piva; Marina Schena; Mario Airoldi; Oliviero Ostellino; Giancarlo Pecorari; Riccardo Ragona; Umberto Ricardi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Analysis of simultaneous modulated accelerated radiotherapy (SMART) for nasopharyngeal carcinomas.

Authors:  Jian Min Tang; Xiu Mei Ma; Yan Li Hou; Li Yan Dai; Hong Bin Cao; Ming Ye; Yong Rui Bai
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-03-09       Impact factor: 2.724

5.  Phase I/II study of induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy and SMART-IMRT-based radiotherapy in locoregionally-advanced nasopharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Ting-Yong Fan; Jun Xing; Jie Lu; Tong-Hai Liu; Min Xu; Ying-Jie Zhang; Qian Shao; Jian-Bin Li; Jin-Ming Yu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 2.967

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.