Literature DB >> 17763381

Impact of non-congestive graft size in living donor liver transplantation: new indicator for additional vein reconstruction in right liver graft.

Hideya Kamei1, Yasuhiro Fujimoto, Shunji Nagai, Ryuichiro Suda, Hidekazu Yamamoto, Tetsuya Kiuchi.   

Abstract

Addition of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) or reconstruction of its tributaries to increase noncongestive graft volume is expected to improve graft function in right liver living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). However, the relationship between noncongestive graft volume and graft function after transplantation has not been clarified and definitive criteria for the reconstruction of MHV tributaries have yet to be established. We analyzed 29 right liver LDLT cases. The noncongestive graft weight was calculated as the total weight of the graft regions drained by hepatic veins reconstructed without postoperative occlusion. We calculated the noncongestive graft-to-recipient weight ratio (ncGRWR) by comparing it to the GRWR. Indocyanine green (ICG) clearance results on days 1 and 3 were significantly correlated with ncGRWR, but not with GRWR. Patients were then divided into 2 groups based on ncGRWR: lower than the median (L-ncGRWR group) and above the median (H-ncGRWR group). ICG clearance in the H-ncGRWR group was significantly better on days 1 and 3. For a different analysis, the patients were again divided into 2 groups, those with and without prolonged cholestasis after transplantation. ncGRWR was significantly lower in patients with prolonged cholestasis, and 7 of 9 patients with an ncGRWR value lower than 0.65 suffered from prolonged cholestasis. Our results demonstrated that the noncongestive volume of a right liver graft has a significant association with early graft function. Further, ncGRWR can play a key role in preoperative determination for additional vein reconstruction of MHV tributaries. When the estimated ncGRWR value with reconstruction of only the right hepatic vein (RHV) (+ inferior right hepatic vein [IRHV]) is less than 0.65, additional vein reconstruction of MHV tributaries should be planned. Copyright 2007 AASLD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17763381     DOI: 10.1002/lt.21231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  4 in total

1.  Small for size syndrome following living donor and split liver transplantation.

Authors:  Hector Daniel Gonzalez; Zi Wei Liu; Sophia Cashman; Giuseppe K Fusai
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-12-27

2.  Risk of venous congestion in live donors of extended right liver graft.

Authors:  Arnold Radtke; George Sgourakis; Ernesto P Molmenti; Susanne Beckebaum; Vito R Cicinnati; Hartmut Schmidt; Heinz-Otto Peitgen; Christoph E Broelsch; Massimo Malagó; Tobias Schroeder
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Correlation of baseline Portal pressure (hepatic venous pressure gradient) and Indocyanine Green Clearance Test With Post-transarterial Chemoembolization Acute Hepatic Failure.

Authors:  Rohit Khisti; Yashwant Patidar; Lalit Garg; Amar Mukund; Sherin Sarah Thomas; Shiv K Sarin
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2018-10-09

4.  Intrahepatic Vascular Anatomy in Rats and Mice--Variations and Surgical Implications.

Authors:  Constanze Sänger; Andrea Schenk; Lars Ole Schwen; Lei Wang; Felix Gremse; Sara Zafarnia; Fabian Kiessling; Chichi Xie; Weiwei Wei; Beate Richter; Olaf Dirsch; Uta Dahmen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.