OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the Adjustable Continence Therapy (ProACT) device, a new device for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence resulting from compromised sphincteric function. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 64 males with post-prostatectomy incontinence underwent ProACT implantation. Efficacy was assessed by means of a daily pad count, a direct visual stress test, administration of the Incontinence Quality of Life (IQOL) and patient global impression (PGI) questionnaires and use of a visual analogue scale (VAS) to assess improvement in incontinence. These assessments were performed at baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the procedure and annually thereafter. RESULTS: The pad count declined from a median of 5.2 at baseline to 2 at 6 months and to 1.54 at 12 months. The median baseline IQOL score was 31.7, and this improved to 62.5 at 6 months and to 71.1 at 12 months. In terms of postoperative daily pad usage, 43 patients (67%) were considered to be dry, 10 (15%) improved and 11 (17%) unchanged. In terms of the post operative PGI score, 42 patients (66%) considered themselves to have improved greatly, 10 (16%) to have improved quite a lot, 6 (9%) to have improved slightly and 6 (9%) to be unchanged. The average improvement based on the VAS was 80%. The average number of postoperative adjustments was three (range zero to nine). Complications included infection (2/64; 3%), erosion of balloons (5/64; 7.6%), migration (2/64; 3%) and balloon deflation (2/64; 3%). Device removal was required in 9/64 patients (14%) but was easily achieved using local anaesthesia, and this thus permitted further therapeutic intervention. New balloons were implanted following endoscopic confirmation of urethral healing. CONCLUSION: The ProACT device represents an efficacious treatment modality, which has an acceptable complication rate for a difficult group of patients.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the Adjustable Continence Therapy (ProACT) device, a new device for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence resulting from compromised sphincteric function. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 64 males with post-prostatectomy incontinence underwent ProACT implantation. Efficacy was assessed by means of a daily pad count, a direct visual stress test, administration of the Incontinence Quality of Life (IQOL) and patient global impression (PGI) questionnaires and use of a visual analogue scale (VAS) to assess improvement in incontinence. These assessments were performed at baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the procedure and annually thereafter. RESULTS: The pad count declined from a median of 5.2 at baseline to 2 at 6 months and to 1.54 at 12 months. The median baseline IQOL score was 31.7, and this improved to 62.5 at 6 months and to 71.1 at 12 months. In terms of postoperative daily pad usage, 43 patients (67%) were considered to be dry, 10 (15%) improved and 11 (17%) unchanged. In terms of the post operative PGI score, 42 patients (66%) considered themselves to have improved greatly, 10 (16%) to have improved quite a lot, 6 (9%) to have improved slightly and 6 (9%) to be unchanged. The average improvement based on the VAS was 80%. The average number of postoperative adjustments was three (range zero to nine). Complications included infection (2/64; 3%), erosion of balloons (5/64; 7.6%), migration (2/64; 3%) and balloon deflation (2/64; 3%). Device removal was required in 9/64 patients (14%) but was easily achieved using local anaesthesia, and this thus permitted further therapeutic intervention. New balloons were implanted following endoscopic confirmation of urethral healing. CONCLUSION: The ProACT device represents an efficacious treatment modality, which has an acceptable complication rate for a difficult group of patients.
Authors: M R Hoda; G Primus; A Schumann; K Fischereder; B von Heyden; N Schmid; V Moll; A Hamza; J J Karsch; F Steinbach; C Brössner; W Bauer; P Fornara Journal: Urologe A Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 0.639
Authors: Javier C Angulo; Sandra Schönburg; Alessandro Giammò; Francisco J Abellán; Ignacio Arance; David Lora Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-12-02 Impact factor: 3.240