Literature DB >> 17762808

Vertebral augmentation with a novel Vessel-X bone void filling container system and bioactive bone cement.

Zhaomin Zheng1, Keith D K Luk, Guanming Kuang, Zhaoyang Li, Jerry Lin, Wing M Lam, Kenneth M C Cheung, William W Lu.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Evaluation of a novel, leakage-free vertebroplastic instrumentation by fresh cadaveric studies.
OBJECTIVES: To compare Vessel-X, a novel percutaneous bone void filling container system, with conventional kyphoplasty in restoring strength, stiffness, and height in experimentally induced vertebral compressive fractures and morphologically determine the cement distribution. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Clinically, both vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty perform well in reinforcement and pain relief. One of the shortcomings, however, is the risk of cement leakage. Vessel-X is a novel bone expander and bone void filler combined instrumentation for vertebral augmentation requiring evaluation.
METHODS: A total of 28 fresh-frozen vertebral specimens were randomly assigned to 4 groups for testing: unipedicular kyphoplasty, bipedicular kyphoplasty, unipedicular Vessel-X, and bipedicular Vessel-X. Compressive fractures were experimentally created on each vertebra after determining the bone mineral density. Kyphoplasty and Vessel-X were performed using bioactive bone cement (SrHAC) under C-arm fluoroscopy and compared by compression testing to measure the effects of augmentation. Morphologic observations were also performed to determine the cement distribution and vertebral height restoration.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in bone mineral density, initial strength, and stiffness in any of the groups. Furthermore, no significant difference was observed in total cement volume in intragroup comparison within the unipedicular or bipedicular groups. Vessel-X bone filler container could expand well and contain most of the cement. The height restoration ranged from 88.5% to 96.4% in all groups. The augmented strength with unipedicular and bipedicular injections reached 3651.57 N and 4833.73 N, respectively. Stiffness with bipedicular injection was significantly higher than that of unipedicular injection.
CONCLUSION: Vessel-X was comparable to kyphoplasty in restoring the mechanical properties and height of the fractured vertebrae. Interestingly, Vessel-X instrumentation showed considerably less cement leakage and better cement placement in the vertebral body. Therefore, it could be a leakage controllable technique in percutaneous vertebral augmentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17762808     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181453f64

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  8 in total

1.  Thoraco-lumbar traumatic vertebral fractures augmentation by osteo-conductive and osteo-inductive bone substitute containing strontium-hydroxyapatite: our experience.

Authors:  Salvatore Masala; Amedeo Taglieri; Antonio Chiaravalloti; Eros Calabria; Marco Morini; Riccardo Iundusi; Umberto Tarantino; Giovanni Simonetti
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  The implantation of a Nickel-Titanium shape memory alloy ameliorates vertebral body compression fractures: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Bo Chen; Yue-Huang Zheng; Tao Zheng; Chang-Hui Sun; Jiong Lu; Peng Cao; Jian-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

3.  Vessel-Plasty Using Bone-Filling Mesh Container for Treatment of Malignant Severe Compression Fractures in Cervical Vertebrae.

Authors:  Yue Yang; Qinghua Tian; Tao Wang; Yingying Lu; Wenbin Li; Chungen Wu
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.832

Review 4.  Nanotechnology for treating osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Chunxia Gao; Donglei Wei; Huilin Yang; Tao Chen; Lei Yang
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-08-13

5.  Vesselplasty versus vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with posterior wall rupture.

Authors:  Kai Xu; Ya-Ling Li; Song-Hua Xiao
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.671

6.  Finite Element Analysis of Unilateral versus Bipedicular Bone-Filling Mesh Container for the Management of Osteoporotic Compression Fractures.

Authors:  Hui Lu; Qichuan Zhang; Fan Ding; Qimei Wu; Rong Liu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Different Associated Aspects That Influence Complication Rates on Clinical PKP Surgery Using Smart Medical Big Data.

Authors:  Bin Fu; Yi Dong; Fang Xiang; Gen Xia; Zhaohao Ning; Huiqiang Ding
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 2.682

8.  Augmentation of a Locking Plate System Using Bioactive Bone Cement-Experiment in a Proximal Humeral Fracture Model.

Authors:  Guan-Ming Kuang; Tak Man Wong; Jun Wu; Jun Ouyang; Haihua Guo; Yapeng Zhou; Christian Fang; Frankie K L Leung; William Lu
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2018-10-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.