Literature DB >> 17762804

Are back supports plus education more effective than education alone in promoting recovery from low back pain?: Results from a randomized clinical trial.

Denise M Oleske1, Steven A Lavender, Gunnar B J Andersson, Mary Morrissey Kwasny.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of a back support plus education versus education alone in promoting recovery from a work-related low back disorder (WR-LBD) while simultaneously considering personal, health, and occupational factors and the impact of occupational factors on recovery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: No randomized studies of active industrial workers with low back disorders exist regarding the effectiveness of back supports plus education.
METHODS: A total of 433 actively employed hourly union workers who had a recent diagnosis of a WR-LBD: 1) those who wore a specially designed back support plus received education on back health; and 2) those who received education on back health only. Demographic, health, medical, and occupational factors were obtained through interview or abstraction of computer files; individual ergonomic exposures were measured with a lumbar motion monitor. Outcomes evaluated over a 12-month period included: self-reported measures of back pain, back pain disability level, physical health, mental health, and administrative measures of recurrence, lost work time, and medical care utilization.
RESULTS: There was no difference between the study groups with respect to mental or physical health, low back pain, back pain disability, neurogenic symptoms, lost work time, likelihood of recurrence of an episode of a back disorder, or other administrative measures of healthcare utilization or lost work time. However, significant decreases in low back pain, low back pain disability, neurogenic symptoms, and an increase in physical health were observed over the 12 months of observation in both study groups. The only occupational variable found to influence was plant group whereby service parts operations workers in the back support plus education group experienced a lower likelihood of WR-LBD recurrence.
CONCLUSION: Although there was no overall effect on self-reported recovery or administrative measures or lost work time between the study groups, a back support plus health education may have some value in preventing recurrent WR-LBD in industrial workers who work in psychosocial environments and perform manual material handling tasks similar to those found in parts distribution centers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17762804     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181453fcc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  13 in total

Review 1.  Non-Specific Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Jean-François Chenot; Bernhard Greitemann; Bernd Kladny; Frank Petzke; Michael Pfingsten; Susanne Gabriele Schorr
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-12-25       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Comparison of four physiotherapy regimens in the treatment of long-term mechanical low back pain.

Authors:  Olubusola E Johnson; Babatunde O A Adegoke; Samuel O Ogunlade
Journal:  J Jpn Phys Ther Assoc       Date:  2010

3.  A randomized clinical trial comparing extensible and inextensible lumbosacral orthoses and standard care alone in the management of lower back pain.

Authors:  David C Morrisette; Jacek Cholewicki; Sarah Logan; Gretchen Seif; Stephanie McGowan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  Lumbar supports for prevention and treatment of low back pain.

Authors:  I C D van Duijvenbode; P Jellema; M N M van Poppel; M W van Tulder
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-04-16

Review 5.  Individual patient education for low back pain.

Authors:  A Engers; P Jellema; M Wensing; D A W M van der Windt; R Grol; M W van Tulder
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23

6.  Immediate Effects of Lumbosacral Orthosis on Postural Stability in Patients with Low Back Pain: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Fatemeh Azadinia; Ismail Ebrahimi-Takamjani; Mojtaba Kamyab; Morteza Asgari; Mohamad Parnianpour
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2019-07

Review 7.  The effect of journal impact factor, reporting conflicts, and reporting funding sources, on standardized effect sizes in back pain trials: a systematic review and meta-regression.

Authors:  Robert Froud; Tom Bjørkli; Philip Bright; Dévan Rajendran; Rachelle Buchbinder; Martin Underwood; David Evans; Sandra Eldridge
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  A Preliminary Study of the Objective Measurement of Compliance Rates for Semirigid Lumbar-Support Use in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: How Important Is the Compliance Rate?

Authors:  Maryam Hekmatfard; Mohammad Ali Sanjari; Nader Maroufi; Hassan Saeedi; Esmail Ebrahimi; Hamid Behtash
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-10-11

9.  The effects of spinal support device on pain and extensibility of the hamstrings in patients with non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Eun Tae Jeon; Jin-Hwa Jung; Jong Hoon Moon; Kyoung-Sim Jung; Young Sik Won; Sung-Jin Kim; Suk-Chan Hahm; Hwi-Young Cho
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-08-10

Review 10.  A systematic review of randomised controlled trials assessing effectiveness of prosthetic and orthotic interventions.

Authors:  Aoife Healy; Sybil Farmer; Anand Pandyan; Nachiappan Chockalingam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.