Literature DB >> 17762740

Volumetric follow-up of meningiomas: a quantitative method to evaluate treatment outcome of gamma knife radiosurgery.

Guenther C Feigl1, Madjid Samii, Gerhard A Horstmann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The most important treatment options for meningiomas are microsurgery, radiotherapy, and gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS). The efficacy of GKRS in terms of local tumor control and tumor volume (TV) reduction can best be determined by accurate analysis of changes in tumor size in pre- and post-GKRS images. In this prospective study, we set the focus on evaluating TV changes and treatment outcome of meningiomas using a quantitative volumetric follow-up protocol after GKRS.
METHODS: Consecutive patients with World Health Organization Grade I and II meningiomas were included in this study. Most patients underwent a microsurgical TV reduction before being treated with GKRS. Follow-up examinations were performed according to a standardized protocol and included magnetic resonance imaging and quantitative volumetric tumor analyses as well as thorough neurological examinations.
RESULTS: Complete follow-up data was available for 211 patients (243 tumors) with a mean age of 57.9 years. TVs ranging from 0.1 to 48.3 cm3 were treated with GKRS using prescription doses ranging from 10 to 22 Gy. The achieved overall tumor control rate determined with quantitative TV analyses after GKRS was 93.4%; a mean TV reduction of 42.1% was achieved in 74.5% of all treated patients.
CONCLUSION: Results of this study show that a quantitative volumetric follow-up study of meningiomas is a useful method to demonstrate the efficacy of GKRS for meningiomas. Statistically significant TV reductions with a low rate of side effects can be achieved with GKRS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17762740     DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000279999.95953.EA

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  7 in total

1.  Quantitative analysis of tumor volume reduction after three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for intracranial meningiomas.

Authors:  Nam Kwon Lee; Chul Yong Kim; Won Sup Yoon; Yong Gu Chung; Nam Joon Lee
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Predictability and uncertainty in arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery.

Authors:  Bruce E Pollock
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2013

3.  Computer-based radiological longitudinal evaluation of meningiomas following stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Eli Ben Shimol; Leo Joskowicz; Ruth Eliahou; Yigal Shoshan
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 4.  Radiotherapy and radiosurgery for benign skull base meningiomas.

Authors:  Giuseppe Minniti; Maurizio Amichetti; Riccardo Maurizi Enrici
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 5.  Radiation therapy for older patients with brain tumors.

Authors:  Giuseppe Minniti; Andrea Riccardo Filippi; Mattia Falchetto Osti; Umberto Ricardi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Linear Accelerator-Based Radiosurgery of Grade I Intracranial Meningiomas.

Authors:  Sara Alatriste-Martínez; Sergio Moreno-Jiménez; Guillermo A Gutiérrez-Aceves; José de Jesús Suárez-Campos; Olivia Amanda García-Garduño; Alejandro Rosas-Cabral; Miguel Ángel Celis-López
Journal:  World Neurosurg X       Date:  2019-03-07

7.  Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Intracranial Noncavernous Sinus Benign Meningioma: International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Marcello Marchetti; Arjun Sahgal; Antonio A F De Salles; Marc Levivier; Lijun Ma; Ian Paddick; Bruce E Pollock; Jean Regis; Jason Sheehan; John H Suh; Shoji Yomo; Laura Fariselli
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.654

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.