OBJECTIVE: Arterial hypertension often leads to an increase in left ventricular mass (LVM). Marked left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is associated with potentially arrhythmogenic ventricular repolarization abnormalities, which may contribute to the increased risk of sudden cardiac death in this disorder. We studied whether electrocardiographic repolarization changes are already detectable in mild LVM increase associated with hypertension. METHODS: In 220 men (mean age 51+/-6 years) attending the GENRES hypertension study, we measured QT intervals (QTend and QTpeak), T-wave peak to T-wave end (TPE) intervals, and novel T-wave morphology parameters (principal component analysis ratio, T-wave morphology dispersion, total cosine R-to-T, and T-wave residuum) from a digital standard 12-lead electrocardiogram, and related them to echocardiographically determined LVM. RESULTS: In this group of moderately hypertensive men, the mean LVM index (LVMI; LVM divided by body surface area) was 99+/-19 g/m2, with only 18% of the subjects showing evidence of echocardiographic LVH (LVMI>116 g/m2). LVMI correlated significantly with QT intervals (r=0.16-0.21, P=0.018-0.002), TPE intervals (r=0.23-0.27, P<0.001), and T-wave morphology parameters (r=0.22-0.39, P<0.001). Except for the QTpeak interval, the relationship between LVMI and electrocardiographic repolarization parameters was independent in multivariate analyses. CONCLUSION: Altered electrocardiographic ventricular repolarization, indicating reduced repolarization reserve and possibly increased repolarization heterogeneity, is already present in hypertensive men with only mild LVM increase. At a population level, this may carry important risk implications for the large group of hypertensive patients.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Arterial hypertension often leads to an increase in left ventricular mass (LVM). Marked left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is associated with potentially arrhythmogenic ventricular repolarization abnormalities, which may contribute to the increased risk of sudden cardiac death in this disorder. We studied whether electrocardiographic repolarization changes are already detectable in mild LVM increase associated with hypertension. METHODS: In 220 men (mean age 51+/-6 years) attending the GENRES hypertension study, we measured QT intervals (QTend and QTpeak), T-wave peak to T-wave end (TPE) intervals, and novel T-wave morphology parameters (principal component analysis ratio, T-wave morphology dispersion, total cosine R-to-T, and T-wave residuum) from a digital standard 12-lead electrocardiogram, and related them to echocardiographically determined LVM. RESULTS: In this group of moderately hypertensivemen, the mean LVM index (LVMI; LVM divided by body surface area) was 99+/-19 g/m2, with only 18% of the subjects showing evidence of echocardiographic LVH (LVMI>116 g/m2). LVMI correlated significantly with QT intervals (r=0.16-0.21, P=0.018-0.002), TPE intervals (r=0.23-0.27, P<0.001), and T-wave morphology parameters (r=0.22-0.39, P<0.001). Except for the QTpeak interval, the relationship between LVMI and electrocardiographic repolarization parameters was independent in multivariate analyses. CONCLUSION: Altered electrocardiographic ventricular repolarization, indicating reduced repolarization reserve and possibly increased repolarization heterogeneity, is already present in hypertensivemen with only mild LVM increase. At a population level, this may carry important risk implications for the large group of hypertensivepatients.
Authors: Annukka Marjamaa; Lasse Oikarinen; Kimmo Porthan; Samuli Ripatti; Gina Peloso; Peter A Noseworthy; Matti Viitasalo; Markku S Nieminen; Lauri Toivonen; Kimmo Kontula; Leena Peltonen; Aki S Havulinna; Antti Jula; Christopher J O'Donnell; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Markus Perola; Veikko Salomaa Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2012-02-15 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Kimmo Porthan; Annukka Marjamaa; Matti Viitasalo; Heikki Väänänen; Antti Jula; Lauri Toivonen; Markku S Nieminen; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Veikko Salomaa; Kimmo Kontula; Lasse Oikarinen Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2010-03-04 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Yiyi Zhang; Wendy S Post; Darshan Dalal; Sandeep Bansal; Elena Blasco-Colmenares; Suzanne Jan De Beur; Alvaro Alonso; Elsayed Z Soliman; Eric A Whitsel; Ramón Brugada; Gordon F Tomaselli; Eliseo Guallar Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2011-04-20 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Daniel J Friedman; Seth R Bender; Steven M Markowitz; Bruce B Lerman; Peter M Okin Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2013-05-03 Impact factor: 1.468
Authors: A Marjamaa; C Newton-Cheh; K Porthan; A Reunanen; P Lahermo; H Väänänen; A Jula; H Karanko; H Swan; L Toivonen; M S Nieminen; M Viitasalo; L Peltonen; L Oikarinen; A Palotie; K Kontula; V Salomaa Journal: J Intern Med Date: 2009-10-25 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Annukka Marjamaa; Veikko Salomaa; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Kimmo Porthan; Antti Reunanen; Hannu Karanko; Antti Jula; Päivi Lahermo; Heikki Väänänen; Lauri Toivonen; Heikki Swan; Matti Viitasalo; Markku S Nieminen; Leena Peltonen; Lasse Oikarinen; Aarno Palotie; Kimmo Kontula Journal: Ann Med Date: 2009 Impact factor: 4.709
Authors: Gary Tse; George Bazoukis; Leonardo Roever; Tong Liu; William K K Wu; Martin C S Wong; Adrian Baranchuk; Panagiotis Korantzopoulos; Dimitrios Asvestas; Konstantinos P Letsas Journal: Curr Atheroscler Rep Date: 2018-09-17 Impact factor: 5.113
Authors: Juraj Kunisek; Luka Zaputovic; Zlatko Cubranic; Leon Kunisek; Marta Zuvic Butorac; Ksenija Lukin-Eskinja; Rade Karlavaris Journal: Anatol J Cardiol Date: 2014-04-02 Impact factor: 1.596