Literature DB >> 17762368

Adolescent baseball pitching technique: a detailed three-dimensional biomechanical analysis.

Carl W Nissen1, Melany Westwell, Sylvia Ounpuu, Mausam Patel, Janet P Tate, Kristan Pierz, Joseph P Burns, James Bicos.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Document the biomechanics of the pitching motion to help provide insight about the etiology of common injuries seen in adolescent baseball pitchers.
METHODS: Kinematic and kinetic data for the upper and lower extremities, thorax, and pelvis were collected from 24 adolescent pitchers, using modern three-dimensional computerized motion-analysis techniques.
RESULTS: Original information regarding forearm and wrist motion was reported in this study and were consistent with expected motions for the fastball pitch. Average excursion of motion was: pronation/supination 63 +/- 15 degrees, wrist flexion/extension 44 +/- 14 degrees, and ulnar/radial deviation 12 +/- 4 degrees. Explosive forearm motion occurred between ball release (BR) and maximal glenohumeral internal rotation (GH-MIR) with a peak pronation velocity of 2051 +/- 646 degrees.s(-1). The majority of internal/external and abduction/adduction shoulder motion was attributed to the glenohumeral motion. Internal glenohumeral rotation range of motion was 125 +/- 13 degrees and mean peak internal glenohumeral rotation velocity was 3343 +/- 453 degrees.s(-1). Thorax and pelvic motion peak velocities and accelerations occurred before the peak elbow varus moment, which occurred at 59% of the pitch cycle (PC). The peak shoulder, elbow, and wrist velocities and accelerations occurred after the peak elbow varus moment. The pelvis squared to the plate at 51 +/- 10% PC and the thorax at 59 +/- 7% PC with maximal glenohumeral external rotation (GH-MER) at 65% PC and BR at 78 +/- 3% PC. The data collected in this study were consistent with the literature, with the exception of joint velocities and moments, which were lower than those in one published study.
CONCLUSION: We have established the kinematic and kinetic parameters of the adolescent baseball pitch. These measured parameters and the differences between adolescent pitchers and their adult counterparts can be used to examine and help determine the causes of the rapid increase in adolescent pitching injuries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17762368     DOI: 10.1249/mss.0b013e318064c88e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  15 in total

Review 1.  The ulnar collateral ligament loading paradox between in-vitro and in-vivo studies on baseball pitching (narrative review).

Authors:  Bart Van Trigt; Liset W Vliegen; Ton Ajr Leenen; DirkJan Hej Veeger
Journal:  Int Biomech       Date:  2021-12

2.  Glenohumeral range of motion and lower extremity flexibility in collegiate-level baseball players.

Authors:  Philip A Anloague; Valerie Spees; Jessica Smith; Michael A Herbenick; L Joseph Rubino
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.843

3.  Prevention of elbow injuries in youth baseball pitchers.

Authors:  Glenn S Fleisig; James R Andrews
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.843

4.  Biomechanical modeling as a practical tool for predicting injury risk related to repetitive muscle lengthening during learning and training of human complex motor skills.

Authors:  Bingjun Wan; Gongbing Shan
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-04-12

5.  Upper Extremity Range of Motion and Pitching Profile of Baseball Pitchers in Japan.

Authors:  Ted Sueyoshi; Takuya Nakatani; Takashi Tsuruta; Gen Emoto
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-07-17

Review 6.  The Relationship Between Pitching Mechanics and Injury: A Review of Current Concepts.

Authors:  Peter N Chalmers; Markus A Wimmer; Nikhil N Verma; Brian J Cole; Anthony A Romeo; Gregory L Cvetanovich; Michael L Pearl
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 3.843

7.  A biomechanical model correlating shoulder kinetics to pain in young baseball pitchers.

Authors:  David W Keeley; Gretchen D Oliver; Christopher P Dougherty
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 2.193

8.  A Biomechanical Evaluation of the Kinetics for Multiple Pitching Techniques in College-Aged Pitchers.

Authors:  Matthew J Solomito; Erin J Garibay; Sylvia Õunpuu; Janet P Tate; Carl W Nissen
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2013-10-22

9.  A biomechanical comparison of pitching from a mound versus flat ground in adolescent baseball pitchers.

Authors:  Carl W Nissen; Matthew Solomito; Erin Garibay; Sylvia Ounpuu; Melany Westwell
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.843

10.  Correlation of upper limb joint load withsimultaneous throwing mechanics including acceleration parameters in amateur baseball pitchers.

Authors:  Yoichi Kaizu; Hideomi Watanabe; Takehiko Yamaji
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2018-02-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.