Literature DB >> 17761970

What is the psychological impact of mammographic screening on younger women with a family history of breast cancer? Findings from a prospective cohort study by the PIMMS Management Group.

Sally Tyndel1, Joan Austoker, Bethan J Henderson, Kate Brain, Clare Bankhead, Alison Clements, Eila K Watson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Studies are underway to establish the clinical effectiveness of annual mammographic screening in women younger than 50 years with a family history of breast cancer. This study investigated both the positive and negative psychological effects of screening on these women. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women who received an immediate all-clear result after mammography (n = 1,174) and women who were recalled for additional tests before receiving an all-clear result (false positive; n = 112) completed questionnaires: 1 month before mammography, and 1 and 6 months after receiving final results. The questionnaires included measures of cancer worry, psychological consequences, and perceived benefits of breast screening.
RESULTS: Women who received an immediate all-clear result experienced a decrease in cancer worry and negative psychological consequences immediately after the result, whereas women who were recalled for additional tests did not. By 6 months this cancer-specific distress had reduced significantly in both groups. Changes in levels of distress were significantly different between the two groups, but in absolute terms the differences were not large. Recalled women reported significantly greater positive psychological consequences of screening immediately after the result, and were also more positive about the benefits of screening compared with women who received an immediate all-clear result.
CONCLUSION: For women receiving an immediate all-clear result, participating in annual mammographic screening is psychologically beneficial. Furthermore, women who are recalled for additional tests do not appear to be harmed by screening: these women's positive views about mammography suggest that they view any distress caused by recall as an acceptable part of screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17761970     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.0437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  11 in total

1.  The Burden of Cystoscopic Bladder Cancer Surveillance: Anxiety, Discomfort, and Patient Preferences for Decision Making.

Authors:  Kevin Koo; Lisa Zubkoff; Brenda E Sirovich; Philip P Goodney; Douglas J Robertson; John D Seigne; Florian R Schroeck
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Living my family's story: identifying the lived experience in healthy women at risk for hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  Meghan L Underhill; Robin M Lally; Marc T Kiviniemi; Christine Murekeyisoni; Suzanne S Dickerson
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.592

3.  Online support: Impact on anxiety in women who experience an abnormal screening mammogram.

Authors:  Eniola T Obadina; Lori L Dubenske; Helene E McDowell; Amy K Atwood; Deborah K Mayer; Ryan W Woods; David H Gustafson; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 4.380

4.  Ovarian cancer symptom awareness and anticipated delayed presentation in a population sample.

Authors:  Kate E Brain; Stephanie Smits; Alice E Simon; Lindsay J Forbes; Chris Roberts; Iain J Robbé; John Steward; Ceri White; Richard D Neal; Jane Hanson
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Influences on anticipated time to ovarian cancer symptom presentation in women at increased risk compared to population risk of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Stephanie Smits; Jacky Boivin; Usha Menon; Kate Brain
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 6.  Psychological and Behavioral Impact of Participation in Ovarian Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Michael A Andrykowski
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2017-03-08

7.  Breast cancer risk, worry, and anxiety: Effect on patient perceptions of false-positive screening results.

Authors:  Janie M Lee; Kathryn P Lowry; Jessica E Cott Chubiz; J Shannon Swan; Tina Motazedi; Elkan F Halpern; Anna N A Tosteson; G Scott Gazelle; Karen Donelan
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 4.380

8.  German National Case Collection for familial pancreatic Cancer (FaPaCa) - acceptance and psychological aspects of a pancreatic cancer screening program.

Authors:  Frederike S Franke; Elvira Matthäi; Emily P Slater; Christoph Schicker; Johannes Kruse; Detlef K Bartsch
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 2.857

Review 9.  Scanxiety: a scoping review about scan-associated anxiety.

Authors:  Kim Tam Bui; Roger Liang; Belinda E Kiely; Chris Brown; Haryana M Dhillon; Prunella Blinman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Mammographic screening for young women with a family history of breast cancer: knowledge and views of those at risk.

Authors:  S Tyndel; A Clements; C Bankhead; B J Henderson; K Brain; E Watson; J Austoker
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.