Literature DB >> 17761810

Changes in activity after a complete spinal cord injury as measured by the Spinal Cord Independence Measure II (SCIM II).

Brigitte Wirth1, Hubertus J A van Hedel, Barbara Kometer, Volker Dietz, Armin Curt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The assessment of rehabilitation efficacy in spinal cord injury (SCI) should be based on a combination of neurological and functional outcome measures. The Spinal Cord Independence Measure II (SCIM II) is an independence scale that was specifically developed for subjects with SCI. However, little is known about the changes in SCIM II scores during and after rehabilitation.
OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to evaluate changes in functional recovery during the first year after a complete SCI as measured by the SCIM II compared with neurological recovery (motor scores according to the American Spinal Injury Association [ASIA]).
METHODS: SCIM II data and ASIA motor scores at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after injury (derived from the database of the European Multicenter Study of Human Spinal Cord Injury) of 64 patients with complete paraplegia and 36 patients with complete quadriplegia were analyzed.
RESULTS: In patients with complete paraplegia, the SCIM II total score improved significantly during the 1-year follow-up, even after discharge from rehabilitation. In contrast, the ASIA motor scores showed little recovery. In patients with quadriplegia, functional and motor recovery developed in parallel during rehabilitation and after discharge.
CONCLUSIONS: The SCIM II is responsive to functional changes in patients with a persistent motor complete SCI. It is clinically useful for monitoring functional improvement during rehabilitation and after discharge. The SCIM II and the clinical examination based on the ASIA protocol are of complementary value and separately describe changes in independence and sensorimotor deficits in SCI patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17761810     DOI: 10.1177/1545968307306240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  18 in total

1.  Using a logarithmic model to predict functional independence after spinal cord injury: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Yohei Tomioka; Osamu Uemura; Ryota Ishii; Meigen Liu
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Reliability and discriminative ability of the spinal cord independence measure III (Thai version).

Authors:  J Wannapakhe; W Saensook; C Keawjoho; S Amatachaya
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Medical complications and falls in patients with spinal cord injury during the immediate phase after completing a rehabilitation program.

Authors:  Jirabhorn Wannapakhe; Preeda Arrayawichanon; Jiamjit Saengsuwan; Sugalya Amatachaya
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  Concurrent validity of single and groups of walking assessments following acute spinal cord injury.

Authors:  A Aigner; A Curt; L G Tanadini; M H Maathuis
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  Functional outcome following inpatient rehabilitation among individuals with complete spinal cord injury in Nepal.

Authors:  Prakriti Khatri; Chutima Jalayondeja; Raju Dhakal; Christine C Groves
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2021-10-07

6.  Racial and ethnic disparities in functioning at discharge and follow-up among patients with motor complete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Denise C Fyffe; Anne Deutsch; Amanda L Botticello; Steven Kirshblum; Kenneth J Ottenbacher
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  External cues benefit walking ability of ambulatory patients with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Sugalya Amatachaya; Pipatana Amatachaya; Mathita Keawsutthi; Wantana Siritaratiwat
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 1.985

8.  Starting a new conversation: Engaging Veterans with spinal cord injury in discussions of what function means to them, the barriers/facilitators they encounter, and the adaptations they use to optimize function.

Authors:  Jennifer N Hill; Salva Balbale; Keshonna Lones; Sherri L LaVela
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 2.554

9.  Co-transplantation of autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and Schwann cells through cerebral spinal fluid for the treatment of patients with chronic spinal cord injury: safety and possible outcome.

Authors:  S Oraee-Yazdani; M Hafizi; A Atashi; F Ashrafi; A-S Seddighi; S M Hashemi; A Seddighi; M Soleimani; A Zali
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 2.772

10.  Operant conditioning of the tibialis anterior motor evoked potential in people with and without chronic incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Aiko K Thompson; Rachel H Cote; Janice M Sniffen; Jodi A Brangaccio
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.