Literature DB >> 17760539

Coronally positioned flap for root coverage in smokers and non-smokers: stability of outcomes between 6 months and 2 years.

Cléverson O Silva1, Antônio Fernando Martorelli de Lima, Antônio Wilson Sallum, Dimitris N Tatakis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Smoking adversely affects the short-term outcomes of coronally positioned flap (CPF) root coverage procedures, but the long-term stability of this procedure in smokers has not been studied. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of smoking on the long-term outcomes of CPF in recession treatment.
METHODS: CPF was used to treat a Miller Class I defect in a maxillary canine or premolar in 10 current smokers (> or =10 cigarettes daily for > or =5 years) and 10 non-smokers (never smokers). At baseline and 6, 12, and 24 months, clinical parameters, including probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), recession depth (RD), and width of keratinized tissue (KT), were determined.
RESULTS: Intragroup analysis showed that CPF failed to maintain the gingival margin at the initially achieved position. RD significantly increased in smokers (from 0.84 +/- 0.49 to 1.28 +/- 0.58 mm) and in non-smokers (from 0.22 +/- 0.29 to 0.50 +/- 0.41 mm) between 6 and 24 months. Further analysis showed that 50% of smokers and 10% of non-smokers lost between 0.5 and 1.0 mm of root coverage in the same period. Intergroup analysis showed that smokers had significantly greater residual recession (P = 0.001) at 24 months. Both smokers and non-smokers lost CAL and experienced decreases in KT.
CONCLUSIONS: The long-term stability of CPF outcomes is less than desirable, particularly in smokers. Two years after a CPF procedure, smokers have significantly greater residual recession compared to non-smokers both statistically and clinically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17760539     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2007.070068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  6 in total

Review 1.  Coronally Positioned Flap for Root Coverage: Comparison between Smokers and Nonsmokers.

Authors:  Bhaumik Nanavati; Neeta V Bhavsar; Mali Jaydeepchandra
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2013-04

2.  The role of smoking and gingival crevicular fluid markers on coronally advanced flap outcomes.

Authors:  Başak Kaval; Diane E Renaud; David A Scott; Nurcan Buduneli
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 6.993

3.  Clinical evaluation and comparison of the efficacy of coronally advanced flap alone and in combination with platelet rich fibrin membrane in the treatment of Miller Class I and II gingival recessions.

Authors:  Santosh Gupta; Ruchi Banthia; Pallavi Singh; Priyank Banthia; Sapna Raje; Neha Aggarwal
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

4.  Sub-epithelial connective tissue graft for root coverage in nonsmokers and smokers: A pilot comparative clinical study.

Authors:  Chini Doraswamy Dwarakanath; Bheemavarapu Divya; Gottumukkala Naga Venkata Satya Sruthima; Gautami Subadra Penmetsa
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug

5.  Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession-type defects.

Authors:  Leandro Chambrone; Maria Aparecida Salinas Ortega; Flávia Sukekava; Roberto Rotundo; Zamira Kalemaj; Jacopo Buti; Giovan Paolo Pini Prato
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-02

6.  Evaluation of periosteum eversion and coronally advanced flap techniques in the treatment of isolated Miller's Class I/II gingival recession: A comparative clinical study.

Authors:  Koel Debnath; Anirban Chatterjee
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.