Literature DB >> 17760301

Impact of the probiotic bacteria Enterococcus faecium NCIMB 10415 (SF68) and Bacillus cereus var. toyoi NCIMB 40112 on the development of serum IgG and faecal IgA of sows and their piglets.

Lydia Scharek1, Jana Guth, Matthias Filter, Michael F G Schmidt.   

Abstract

To examine the influence of two different probiotic bacteria on the humoral immune system of swine, two animal studies were carried out with sows and their litters. The sows' feed was supplemented with either Enterococcusfaecium NCIMB 10415 (SF68) or Bacillus cereus var. toyoi NCIMB 40112 beginning early in pregnancy. The total IgA content in the faeces as well as the total IgG concentration in the blood of the sows was recorded before and after weaning. The same parameters were determined in the blood and faeces of the piglets. In sows, only feed supplementation with B. cereus led to a clear increase in faecal IgA. Serum IgG levels were not significantly affected by any probiotic feeding in sows. In piglets, the group that was fed B. cereus showed significantly higher faecal IgA levels shortly before weaning, whereas in the E. faecium group, a significant decrease in IgA levels was observed one week after weaning. In both probiotic fed groups the post-weaning IgG levels were significantly decreased compared to the respective control groups. We conclude that B. cereus var. toyoi feed supplementation led to an increased intestinal IgA secretion both in sows and piglets. This effect could be related to a more successful mucosal defence which in turn led to a lower level in systemic IgG production in piglets after weaning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17760301     DOI: 10.1080/17450390701431540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Anim Nutr        ISSN: 1477-2817            Impact factor:   2.242


  19 in total

1.  Survival, Intestinal Mucosa Adhesion, and Immunomodulatory Potential of Lactobacillus plantarum Strains.

Authors:  Valentini Santarmaki; Yiannis Kourkoutas; Georgia Zoumpopoulou; Eleni Mavrogonatou; Mikis Kiourtzidis; Nikos Chorianopoulos; Chrysoula Tassou; Effie Tsakalidou; Constantinos Simopoulos; Petros Ypsilantis
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Feeding of Enterococcus faecium NCIMB 10415 Leads to Intestinal miRNA-423-5p-Induced Regulation of Immune-Relevant Genes.

Authors:  Susanne Kreuzer-Redmer; Jennifer C Bekurtz; Danny Arends; Ralf Bortfeldt; Barbara Kutz-Lohroff; Soroush Sharbati; Ralf Einspanier; Gudrun A Brockmann
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Effects of the Probiotic Enterococcus faecium and Pathogenic Escherichia coli Strains in a Pig and Human Epithelial Intestinal Cell Model.

Authors:  Ulrike Lodemann; Julia Strahlendorf; Peter Schierack; Shanti Klingspor; Jörg R Aschenbach; Holger Martens
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2015-03-26

Review 4.  The use of lactic Acid bacteria as a probiotic in Swine diets.

Authors:  Fengjuan Yang; Chengli Hou; Xiangfang Zeng; Shiyan Qiao
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2015-01-27

Review 5.  Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and probiotics in swine: what the bleep do we know?

Authors:  Jean Daniel Dubreuil
Journal:  Biosci Microbiota Food Health       Date:  2017-04-29

6.  Effects of Newly Developed Synbiotic and Commercial Probiotic Products on The Haematological Indices, Serum Cytokines, Acute Phase Proteins Concentration, and Serum Immunoglobulins Amount in Sows and Growing Pigs - A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Ewelina Czyżewska-Dors; Krzysztof Kwit; Ewelina Stasiak; Jarosław Rachubik; Katarzyna Śliżewska; Małgorzata Pomorska-Mól
Journal:  J Vet Res       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 1.744

7.  Intestinal colonization with Enterococcus faecium does not influence pulmonary defense against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in mice.

Authors:  Masja Leendertse; Rob J L Willems; Ida A J Giebelen; Joris J T H Roelofs; Janetta Top; Marc J M Bonten; Tom van der Poll
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Feeding of the probiotic bacterium Enterococcus faecium NCIMB 10415 differentially affects shedding of enteric viruses in pigs.

Authors:  Susanne Kreuzer; Patrycja Machnowska; Jens Aßmus; Matthias Sieber; Robert Pieper; Michael Fg Schmidt; Gudrun A Brockmann; Lydia Scharek-Tedin; Reimar Johne
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.683

9.  The general composition of the faecal virome of pigs depends on age, but not on feeding with a probiotic bacterium.

Authors:  Jana Sachsenröder; Sven O Twardziok; Matthias Scheuch; Reimar Johne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Walleye Autochthonous Bacteria as Promising Probiotic Candidates against Flavobacterium columnare.

Authors:  Hamza Seghouani; Carlos-Enrique Garcia-Rangel; Jérémie Füller; Jeff Gauthier; Nicolas Derome
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.